|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
charlieDD
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:18 am Post subject: Korean Military General: Korea has no gays |
|
|
We heard the Iranian president Mr. I'm a Nut Job . . declare yesterday there were no homosexuals in Iran.
Reading a Korea Herald from the early 90's recently, I recall seeing an article where a Korean top military official said in response to the American military's new "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy and whether Korea's military, which had to work closely with the American military, would be impacted by the new American policy . . . "Korea doesn't have gay people, so it won't have any impact at all on our military" . . or something to that effect.
Look around Korea now and see all the metrosexual men, the openly gay men and women . . .
What do you think? Iran in 20 years, 30 years, . . . . ???? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, well I remember the Iraqi information minister saying Saddam would behead George Bush on the banks of the Euphrates. So what? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sojourner1

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I crack up laughing my arse off when I hear someone say that we have no gays. Gay people are in every country of the world as many of you already know. I am working on saying that when a big shot leader man who broadcasts he has no gays on his team actually is a gay man insecure about his homosexuality. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
sojourner1 wrote: |
I crack up laughing my arse off when I hear someone say that we have no gays. Gay people are in every country of the world as many of you already know. I am working on saying that when a big shot leader man who broadcasts he has no gays on his team actually is a gay man insecure about his homosexuality. |
Are you suggesting that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a gay man insecure about his sexuality?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"Korea doesn't have gay people, so it won't have any impact at all on our military" . . or something to that effect.
Look around Korea now and see all the metrosexual men, the openly gay men and women . . .
|
You are assuming, of course, that men dressing in the style that the western media has dubbed "metrosexual" is evidence of there being more open homosxuality in Korea. But I'm not convinced that this is a valid correlation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
freethought
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
"Korea doesn't have gay people, so it won't have any impact at all on our military" . . or something to that effect.
Look around Korea now and see all the metrosexual men, the openly gay men and women . . .
|
You are assuming, of course, that men dressing in the style that the western media has dubbed "metrosexual" is evidence of there being more open homosxuality in Korea. But I'm not convinced that this is a valid correlation. |
You're right in that there is a slight degree of cultural relativism, but the exhibition of homesexual behaviour in this country goes beyond what I've seen in extensive travels. I have lots of gay friends here as well, korean and foreign, and all of them say this is a very 'gay' country.
Case in point: http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200708/200708230011.html
When you consider that the article above is talking about the ARMY, it says a lot. Men who wear make-up, have bigger purses than any woman, take more time to do their hair and pick their clothes, love ballad music, wear the colour of clothing that they do, have cleavage lines in men's shirts, hold hands, try to shove fingers up each other's butts, etc it goes beyond culture...
it's gay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
willardmusa
Joined: 28 May 2006
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From someone who lived in Korea in that period, and then subsequently in the late 90's and then again in the '04-'06, I would say the "metrosexual", the effiminate males, do represent a major change, a softening, in Korean male sexuality, and the OP's pointing it out is indeed relevant.
Back in the late 80's and early 90's, men were men / women were women in Korea. Men were tough guys, for the most part.
The somewhat effiminate traits of many Korean males, straight as they may be, is so very different from this. A guy acting like a metrosexual back then? It just would have been so gay !
Yes, a metrosexual isn't likely gay, though he may be. However, the existence of this kind of person in Korean society represents a much more open attitude toward what defines what a man is in Korea. Along with this development you can see much more open homesexual expression in Korea. An openly gay movie star in the early 90's just could not have existed.
The more important observation the OP makes is how if we just live long enough, we can look forward to countries like Iran free of dictators, the politician and the religious types. I agree. Good observation, Charlie; and good research.
I think we could add another observation: Korea isn't that far away from its military governments and leaders like that quoted general. The reported comment was from 1992 (when Clinton took office for his first term and issued the new policy within weeks thereafter). That's only 15 years ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sex changes are legal in Iran so I think their position is that gay ppl are anatomically one sex and physiologically another sex. Still dumb imo but just somethign to think about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the US is still not very progressive on homosexuality if the OP is talking about progressiveness and if he thinks for example gay marriage should be permitted. There is heated debate about that in the U.S. and many gay translators of Arabic were fired. In England and Canada, you cannot fire someone for being gay in the military or government. Not long ago, I used to hear about being gay could compromise one's security. Also, I remember the CNN report saying that were thousands of young homosexuals in the streets who were abandoned by their parents or kicked out of their homes. I am sure there are many in a similar situation in Canada, but I haven't seen such a report. I don't know what the French military thinks, but I doubt the Russians are progressive on the issue. We saw how they beat up some homosexuals from England on camera in Moscow.
P.S. didn't General Pace say homosexuality is immoral.. It tells you what the military thinks of having gays in there... At least, some of the brass..
Last edited by Adventurer on Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Men who wear make-up, have bigger purses than any woman, take more time to do their hair and pick their clothes, love ballad music, wear the colour of clothing that they do, have cleavage lines in men's shirts, hold hands, try to shove fingers up each other's butts, etc it goes beyond culture...
it's gay. |
Sorry, but I'm still not convinced. Pointing out supposedly feminine behavior on the part of males doesn't prove homosexuality. Someone from a culture where women don't wear pants, drive trucks, or smoke in public could use your logic to prove that North American women are all lesbians.
As for dong-chimming: when little children do it to their teachers, is it always regarded as a sign that the children are sexually attracted to the teachers? And if not, then why does it suddenly become a sign of sexual attraction when adult males do it to each other?
And just to pre-empt a strawman: no, I'm not saying there is no homosexuality in Korea. Probably, there is as much over here as there is in the west. I'm just saying that the methodology being employed here to demonstrate its prevalence is flawed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Treefarmer

Joined: 29 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
i don't think an open attitude to homosexuality and freedom in other regards go hand in hand
look at thailand etc they have much more advanced views on sexuality than the west, but democracy hmmmmm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|