|
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sejpdw
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 217 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: make the water boil |
|
|
# Given Passage #
_____________________________________________________________
The sensible way to boil an egg is in a pot of water on a hot stove. Dr. Irving Rudnick of the University of California, however, thought he could boil an egg just by talking to a pot of water. He figured he would have to keep on saying, ꡒBoil, boil, boil!ꡓ for the next twenty thousand years.
Since he wouldn't be around quite that long, he did some more thinking. This time he came up with another idea. He thought he could make the water boil if he had thirty-five million people all say, ꡒBoil!ꡓ at the same time through a telephone receiver pointed at the water. But, of course, this wouldn't work either. Next, the scientist had a steel siren made. Its sound was like thirty-five million voices all saying, ꡒBoil!ꡓ at the same time. And it worked.
_____________________________________________________________
# Gvien Sentence #
_____________________________________________________________
" He thought the ultrasonic waves could make the water [u]boil[/u] in two minutes. "
_____________________________________________________________
1. In the previous sentence, can "boiled" be used instead of " boil" when we consider the given passage?
2. In the previous sentence, can "boiled" be used instead of "boil" when we ignore the given passage? What I mean is if "boiled" can be used in another contenxt.
3. If #2 is true, what's the difference between them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob S.

Joined: 29 Apr 2004 Posts: 1767 Location: So. Cal
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:55 am Post subject: Re: make the water boil |
|
|
| sejpdw wrote: |
# Gvien Sentence #
_____________________________________________________________
" He thought the ultrasonic waves could make the water boil in two minutes. "
_____________________________________________________________
1. In the previous sentence, can "boiled" be used instead of " boil" when we consider the given passage?
2. In the previous sentence, can "boiled" be used instead of "boil" when we ignore the given passage? What I mean is if "boiled" can be used in another context.
3. If #2 is true, what's the difference between them? |
1. No. He is making a prediction about future events, so you cannot use past tense.
2. Yes if you make it a conditional past perfect form:
He thought the ultrasonic waves could have boiled the water in two minutes.
3. Could boil continues to predict a future action. Could have boiled expresses an opinion of possibility of an action that did not happen and will not happen in the future because all the action was in the past. _________________ "It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|