Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What does �it� refer to?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fw



Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 361

PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:23 pm    Post subject: What does �it� refer to? Reply with quote

What does �it� in the last sentence in the following passage refer to, #1 or #2?
1. to say whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home
2. whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home

Emily *beep* is one of the greatest poets America has ever known. She wrote hundreds, hundreds of poems, but most of them remained unpublished during her lifetime. It is hard to say whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home. 

First I thought #1, but now I am beginning to wonder if #2 might be correct. What do you, native speakers of English, think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragn



Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 450

PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could legitimately think of it either way:

[To say whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home] is hard.

=> It is hard [to say whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home].

Or...

[Whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home] is hard to say.

=> It is hard to say [whether these poems were intended to be published or to be kept simply at home].

Take your pick. To be honest, native speakers don't really "think" of it either way. Use of the dummy subject it is so natural for speakers of English that we don't think about it at all. It only serves a syntactic (structural) function, rather than being thought of as referring clearly and specifically to a distinct object.

Hope this makes sense.

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redset



Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 582
Location: England

PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I completely agree with Greg here, but just in case you're not asking about the grammatical structure...

There are basically two readings of this sentence:

We don't really know whether the poems were intended for publication or to be kept at home, so it's hard to be sure what the intention was ('it's hard to say').

Maybe we do know what the intention was, but it's hard to say (talk about) what that intention is. Maybe we're not allowed to discuss it, or it's emotionally difficult to speak about it.

With no other context most native speakers would assume the first interpretation - it's hard to say usually means 'I can't be sure', whereas it's hard to talk about usually means 'this is an uncomfortable subject of discussion'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group