Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

using poverty yields a lot of poor white kids and poor Asian

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Learning English
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
joyapple



Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:21 am    Post subject: using poverty yields a lot of poor white kids and poor Asian Reply with quote

(When the University of California, Berkeley briefly considered introducing means-based affirmative action, it rejected the idea on the ground that �using poverty yields a lot of poor white kids and poor Asian kids�. )

Whao does �using poverty yields a lot of poor white kids and poor Asian kids�mean? Will University of California adopt means-based affirmative action or not?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asterix



Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 1654

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It means that if you use poverty (the family's annual income has to be below a certain amount) as a guideline for preferential treatment when applying for admission to the university, you will get a lot of eligible poor white people and a lot of eligible poor asian people

No, I would say that U of C Berkely did not adopt the measure, but only considered it briefly. (This means they only thought about it for a short time, and then dropped the idea).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kerstin



Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Taiwan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:24 am    Post subject: 3 questions Reply with quote

Aid workers are racing to stockpile food ahead of *that* raining season, knowing most roads will soon become impassable.
Is *the* better than that in that case?

After several *passionate* debates...
Doesn't passionate have a positive meaning? It doesn't seem to sit well with *debates*.

A parent can call *to* the Robot and then they can watch how their children are doing therough teh eyes of the Robot .
Is teh *to* omitable?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
asterix



Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 1654

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kerstin.
Usually we say, "The rainy season", but it may be referring to a rainy season that had just been discussed, in which case, that is OK.

Passionate, in debates, usually means heated arguments about deeply held views.
Passionate in general means to feel very strongly about something, and is indeed positive.

I think you can leave out the to without any loss or change of meaning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Learning English All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group