Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums

[kitti keawpratoom]

I think AMD cheap than INTEL and efficient and do you think ?

[Corey]

I have an AMD. It has been very good. Also, I didn't like that Intel was trying to secretly put tracking devices into chips a few years ago.

Good luck,

Corey
_________________
Niagara Summer Programs

[Hugo]

[i]I have an AMD's processor "Athlon 2200+".
Athlon is cheaper than Intel's processor Pentium.
And Athlon is same spec Pentium.
Pentium is brand and PRADA also is brand.
These are same meaning.
Athlon is good processor![/i][/b]

[kobe is my idol]

My cpu is intel Celeron2.0G.Its stabilization is better than AMD.
_________________
kobe is my idol,forever!

[Zanthrick]

Anymore I find the speed of the processor isn't that important anymore. Since AMD is usually a better deal in terms of performance and price, for general computing it's what I recommend.
It's really not worth arguing over anymore since the video card is the limiting factor for most games. If you aren't playing games and not doing research, then who cares .

As far as stability is concerned I find that has more to do with the software then anything, especially device drivers.

Now the real argument is.. why does the software cost so much? Why do schools always want to use the latest version of Microsoft Office(ARg arg!).
mmm... what I would give to have BeOS as the main stream OS instead of windows.. *sigh*

[eidiosn12]

So, i think AMD and Intel the difference r Price and the Quality
althought intel P4 is the best cpu,but i think AMD by the cheap price,give the pc fans a reply,so i am not agree with kobe's discuss about p4 celron is better than AMD

I f u do not agree with me,please give me emai:[email protected]

I have the MSN,hope to discuss with u!

and U know it which Duron 2.0 can be made to AMD Hammer 64

It's greatest right?

My pc is AMD althonxp 2200+
DDR 512mb (kingMax)
Seagate 80G
Ati Raedon 9800xt ultra
Please give me some advise !

[kitti keawpratoom]

I agree INTEL have stability more then AMD but AMD have speed of processor more then INTEL . Both INTEL and AMD are the competition is stiff not only speed of the processor but also stabilization and other .

I think more people choose AMD due to the difference between AMD and INTEL evident it�s less expensive by efficient in the vicinity INTEL .

Now a day AMD have a development to produce chip or CPU 64 bit available now for competition INTEL, Pentium 4 have property Hyper streaming and working well multimedia because have cache memory more then AMD .

I have Pentium 4 used in a long time by few year ago I consider INTEL because during many year ago INTEL company is over the goal secondly AMD . I believe more publicity that affect is expensive when compares favorably with AMD owing to AMD in Thai have the least publicity . While I want PC high performance but PC have performance well not only processor speed but also other part such as mainboard (FSB) harddisk , ram and other but if you like playing games I think you should select display card have memory�s card enough for that game or more .
Finally I believe that both INTEL and AMD have efficient and stabilization and I think you should select suitable your work .

[alone_aun]

I love prefect INTEL I have P.4 2.8c(800MHZ) It can support more system . moreover have system bus (800MHZ) and Hyper-pipelined
I used VGA card have more memory processor due to I like play games such YURI,NEED FOR SPEED and game have high graphic . I never use chip'AMD I don't about AMD In mind first is INTEL HA HA HA

[kerokerokerokero]

[quote="kitti keawpratoom"]:roll: :roll: :roll: I think AMD cheap than INTEL and efficient and do you think ? :idea: :idea: :roll: :idea:[/quote]Hello, kitti keawpratoom.
I also think AMD is cheap than INTEL.

My first PC�s CPU was K6-2@450MHz(AMD).
Why did I choose this CPU?
The answers were the value and the performance.
If I use office soft, AMD is powerful than INTEL.
I don�t pay a lot of money for PC.
Because I didn�t use PC so much and need high specs.
I don�t play games like internet game, Ragnarok, on PC.
I just use PC for making word or powerpaoint files and check mails.
But sometimes I use it for listening and create music.

[Druid]

The destinctions between Intel & AMD over the years has blured due in part to there overall acceptance in the market place.
Intel processors were the first on the maret so have a head start in the marketing through brand name association. AMD on theh other hand are newbys by comparison.

I personelly would side with AMD as Intels chips are overpriced for no real advantages.

Stability wise I have had no problems with AMD as long as there is sufficient power to run them which on most PCs nowadays would not be a problem

INTEL
+ Established brand
+ Used in Buisness
+ Good track record
- Expensive

AMD
+ Cheap
+ Readly available
+ Widely supported by hardware
- Runs hot (Good cooling a must)
- Power hungry (must have at least 350W PSU for best performance)

[aoh,baby!]

i think AMD usually has a better sense on playing games and some other entertainments. and INTEL is better at extracting files and some high speed computing.(sorry im a shanghainese,so my vocab is not as good as u guys,hope u can understand what im saying)

[flowerkill]

it depends on what works do you perfome?that is,if you want playing games or typing assignments,AMD is enough,but for me,because i focus on computer grapher,i like INTEL

[kobe is my idol]

[jameswong]

hi, i am james. i would like your help. please give your opinions in this title under opinions:-

Is new technology increasing the humans health condition?

thank you.