| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
missdaredevil
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 1670
Location: Ask me
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:38 pm Post subject: exception |
 |
|
Our criminal justice system is flooded with cases that don't involve dangerous individuals. *Anonymity should be the exception, not the rule*.
What does that mean?
Anonymity should only apply when the dependants are dangerous?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mister Micawber
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 774
Location: Yokohama
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
.
Yes, it seems so. But it is an odd idea, isn't it? I would think that we would want to know the names of the dangerous ones.
Are the two sentences indeed related?
.
_________________
"I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences." � Gertrude Stein
...............
Canadian-American who teaches English for a living at Mr Micawber's |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
missdaredevil
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 1670
Location: Ask me
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The sentences are connected as in the actual article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
