| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
welkins2139
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:06 am Post subject: have been/ |
|
|
I have been to the theme park.
I have gone to the theme park.
I have gone to the theme park via that I drove there many times.
Are they ok ?
Thank you |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
been to a place = visited/gone and returned. (not in that place at present)
gone to a place = is in that place at present.
In the second and third sentences, it is good to put 'been'.
Logically, 'gone' can't apply to the first person, 'I'. You might say 'I am at the theme park.'
But I don't rule out the possibility that 'I have gone to... (I am at....).' could be acceptable in some (native) variant of English. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the USA, you could say either "I have been to the theme park" or "I have gone to the theme park" to mean that you have visited the theme park.
I do not understand "via that I drove there many times." You could say either
"I have gone to the theme park via automobile" or
"I have driven to the theme park many times" (by automobile implied),
but your use of "via that I drove there many times" is not correct English.
Yours truly, CP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|