View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
missdaredevil
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 1670 Location: Ask me
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:41 pm Post subject: is?was |
|
|
When I first saw her I thought she was a fellow teenager, but she *is*already 28.
or was? she is still 28 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think either one is fine.
At the time I first saw her (recently), I was a teenager and she was already 28, although I thought she was a teenager. If I put it all in the past tense and write it down, it will be a correct statement even if no one reads it for 100 years.
But if we're talking and I'm telling you about it, and it happened only a few days ago, it is true that she is 28 right now. Nothing is lost by putting it in the present tense. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kerstin
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 241 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, it depends on if she is still that age or not?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. She's still 28 and I'm still a teenager when I speak or write the words, so the words are true.
If it's five years later, I should put it in the past tense so that the words will be true. But I can also use the past tense right now because when I first saw her it was in the past also -- albeit the recent past. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iitimone7
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 400 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:07 pm Post subject: is/was |
|
|
kerstin and msdare- for the sake of a lenghthy explanation, was in the sentence presented is more like using the word as the past tense of is.
does that make sense? iitimone7 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|