| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
relaxation07
Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: used to vs. would |
|
|
Dear all,
I'd like to know if there is any differece between 'used to' and 'would' meaning-wise. As far as I know, there is no difference in them except that they differ in that 'would' doesn't take stative verbs. So I thought 'I used to go hiking on Sundays' and 'I would go hiking on Sundays' mean the same in meaning.
Much appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2006
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They have the same meaning if you are talking about the past, but "would" can also refer to the future.
You cannot say "mean the same in meaning". You can say "have the same meaning' or 'mean the same thing'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
myprofe

Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 425 Location: Madrid, Spain - Native Boston, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: used to - would |
|
|
The only difference I would point out is that although both forms refer to what normally happened at some time in the past expressing it with the form "used to" means that it doesn't happen now. _________________ I'm never going to learn if you don't correct my mistakes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
relaxation07
Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear myprofe
So, expressing it with 'would' doesn't necessary mean that 'it doesn't happen now.' Then if somebody says 'I would go hiking on Sundays when I was little,' is it likely that he or she still goes hiking on Sundays?
Thank you so much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|