View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dido4
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 277
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:00 am Post subject: the wilsons |
|
|
1.The Brown children are planning to see a movie.
2.The Browns are planning to see a movie.
3.The Brown family are planning to see a movie.
4.The Brown's children are planning to see a movie.
Q:Are the bold words the same? I mean do they have the same meaning?
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
#4 is incorrect.
The rest are Ok, but only #2 and #3 mean the same thing: the whole family. #1 means only the children.
In #3, the Americans might prefer to say is, instead of are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dido4
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 277
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Anuradha Chepur.
Thank you for your reply.
Please explain more about the sentence #4 The Brown's children are plaining to see a movie.
Q1: Why is it wrong?
Q2:Does it have to be rewrittten like this:
Brown's children are planning to see a movie.
Thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, Dido4, you can rewrite it the way you have done.
When you say the Brown family, the Brown children, you are using a proper noun to modify another noun. So you should put an article.
But in the Brown's family, the proper noun is not a modifier, so you shouldn't put an article. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about the Browns' children ? I would think that was okay, but I couldn't accept Brown's children since Brown is a last name. I would think John's children would be okay though, or Mr. Brown's children. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|