| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
learner1
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 333
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:16 am Post subject: leave/let |
|
|
Hello,
Do the four expressions all have the same meaning:
'leave someone/something be'
'let someone/something be'
'leave someone/something alone'
'let someone/something alone'
e.g.
1."The baby is crying!" "Leave/Let him be/alone; he'll soon stop."
2."Let/Leave him be/alone, he is doing no harm."
Than you very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buddhaheart
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 195 Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. Leave someone be
not worry someone, or allow them to continue what they are doing.
2. Leave someone alone
Go away ; don�t interfere.
3. let someone be
stop criticizing or annoying someone.
4. *Let someone alone
No such expression. Not that I know.
1."The baby is crying!" "Leave/Let him be/alone; he'll soon stop."
Depending on the meaning you�re trying to convey, 1. & 2. are possible with this sentence.
2."Let/Leave him be/alone, he is doing no harm."
Again depending on the meaning you�re trying to convey, I think all three are possible with this sentence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
learner1
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 333
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello buddhaheart,
First, let me thank you for your reply. However, I am still confused. After consulting the dictionary, the two phrases 'leave someone/sthg alone' and 'leave someone/sthg be' seem to have the same meaning to me. Their definition as follows:
leave somebody/something be:
old-fashioned to not upset, speak to, or annoy someone or to not touch something
leave somebody/something alone:
a) to stop annoying or upsetting someone
b)to stop touching something
Are they interchangeable if they mean the same?
If so, do native speakers usually use 'leave...alone instead?
Thank you very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buddhaheart
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 195 Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In some context, the definition of the 2 expressions would seem to indicate they could be used interchangeably. We use mostly �leave sb/sth alone� here. �Leave sb/sth be� is probably old-fashioned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buddhaheart
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 195 Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let me make a correction here to my 1st reply: �Let sb/sth alone� is similar to �let sb/sth be� or �leave sb/sth untouched�.
�Leave alone� is interchangeable with �let alone� only in the sense to refrain from annoying or interfering with� as �let alone� could mean �not to mention�.
So �let him be� is synonymous with �leave him be� but the latter is considered substandard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
learner1
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 333
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Buddhaheart,
Thanks a lot to you for your kind reply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|