|
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fw
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 361
|
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:07 am Post subject: more a part of himseld than surrounding objects |
|
|
I came across the following passage the other day.
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than surrounding objects, and will play with his toes without any feeling that they belong to him more than the rattle by his side; and it is only by degrees, through pain, that he understands the fact of the body. (from W. Somerset Maugham�s �Of Human Bondage�)
The first half of the first sentence above is, I think, considered to be:
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than (it is) a part of surrounding objects.
Am I correct? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dragn
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than surrounding objects, and will play with his toes without any feeling that they belong to him more than the rattle by his side; and it is only by degrees, through pain, that he understands the fact of the body. (from W. Somerset Maugham�s �Of Human Bondage�)
The first half of the first sentence above is, I think, considered to be:
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than (it is) a part of surrounding objects. |
Your question is strangely worded, but I'm guessing that you want to know if your version of the sentence represents a correct interpretation of the original.
Yes, that's what the author means.
Greg |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|