Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

more a part of himseld than surrounding objects

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fw



Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 361

PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:07 am    Post subject: more a part of himseld than surrounding objects Reply with quote

I came across the following passage the other day.

The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than surrounding objects, and will play with his toes without any feeling that they belong to him more than the rattle by his side; and it is only by degrees, through pain, that he understands the fact of the body. (from W. Somerset Maugham�s �Of Human Bondage�)

The first half of the first sentence above is, I think, considered to be:
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than (it is) a part of surrounding objects.

Am I correct?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragn



Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 450

PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than surrounding objects, and will play with his toes without any feeling that they belong to him more than the rattle by his side; and it is only by degrees, through pain, that he understands the fact of the body. (from W. Somerset Maugham�s �Of Human Bondage�)

The first half of the first sentence above is, I think, considered to be:
The new-born child does not realize that his body is more a part of himself than (it is) a part of surrounding objects.


Your question is strangely worded, but I'm guessing that you want to know if your version of the sentence represents a correct interpretation of the original.

Yes, that's what the author means.

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group