| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
whiffycat
Joined: 12 Nov 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:25 am Post subject: Comma preceding main clause? |
|
|
Holding the camera tightly, I looked through the hole.
Is the comma necessary here?
If it is, is it because a comma must precede the main clause? Or is it because "holding the camera tightly" is non-restrictive?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redset
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 582 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The first clause is an adverbial clause - in this case it represents a background action which was begun before the action in the main clause. And yeah, when a subordinate clause starts a sentence we usually follow it with a comma - it can also add to the sense of time progressing by putting a pause between the first action and the second one:
'Putting the camera down, I went to open the door' - first I put the camera down, and when that was done I answered the door.
The comma can be important where the separation of clauses is ambiguous too:
I looked through the hole holding the camera tightly
In this sentence it's not clear whether the subject is holding the camera, or if the hole is holding it.
I hope that makes sense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whiffycat
Joined: 12 Nov 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|