Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

B1 and B52 Bombers

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Diana



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 494
Location: Guam, USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2003 1:28 pm    Post subject: B1 and B52 Bombers Reply with quote

Well, the B1 and B52 bombers are now on Guam, and more are on the way according to President Bush. They've already begun increasing the military here as a result of North Korea. My brother's ship, which is an aircraft carrier, is also in the Pacific region because of North Korea. I hope North Korea gives up its nuclear weapons program. I hope we can find some peace in the Pacific region.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:30 pm    Post subject: Flying Fortresses In Guam Reply with quote

If George Bush hadn't said that North Korea was among all evils throughout this world maybe this wouldn't have occured. Certainly, this regime is far more dangerous than the Iraki one and all you've read about Saddam Hussein is certainly "Alice In The Wonderland" likened to this strong stalinist country. Not sure that the USA will have the same behaviour towards them because here you haven't a third class army but a very tough one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Diana



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 494
Location: Guam, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Chris,

I did not have a problem when Bush said that the United States will stand against any country that supports terrorism. The problem I had was when he started NAMING those countries, which I feel is unnecessary. After all, I'm sure those countries know who they are.

I honestly don't understand North Korea. Bush did say that he has no interest in attacking North Korea, and they are even sending food to the starving people there. So, why is North Korea putting itself in the radar screen? They're even firing test missiles north of Japan. Do you think they're trying to see if their missiles can reach Guam?

Guam has played a vital role in the past in taking in Vietnamese refugees during the Vietnam War and Kurdish refugess in 1996. I guess we are going to be playing that same role again if the US goes to war with Iraq. I just hope we can find a peaceful solution with North Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 2:47 pm    Post subject: To Attack The USA? Reply with quote

Hi Diana,

Frankly, I'm not sure that he has the capacity to reach Guam with his missiles but that's certainly a big threat for Japan and perhaps South Korea only because there are American troops there. I will say that this regime is playing a double game, on one hand they want to normalize their relation with the South but on the other one they want to show that they could be a major player in the region. Only one thing is sure, this regime is tougher, stronger than the one you can see in Irak: that's why George Bush and his warmonger agents, in brief the far right of the Republicans, among his Cabinet can't respond to them in the same way than towards Hussein.

North Korea is a pure national communist country, the same that you could find around the former USSR during the cold war like for instance Romania when she was ruled by Caucescu. I remember that you've been most impressed by Saddam's cult of personality but in Northern Korea this expression of the power is far more developed.

Personally, I haven't ever heard or read that this regime was supporting different terrorist squads around the world and I think, for the West, we must focus on all radical religious groups to eradicate them which are the major threat. When you want to mix politics and religion, that's the biggest fuel to retrieve a lot of troubles. That's why now there's an antagonism between the "Old Europe" and the USA: we do not either want of the islamic jihad or a christian crusade. That's all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Diana



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 494
Location: Guam, USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Chris,

Well, now Japan is threatening to sanction North Korea if it continues to fire test missiles toward them. I know that Bush stopped sending oil to North Korea because the Koreans claimed that they already have a nuclear weapon.

I agree that religion should stay out of politics. Religion is an individual thing and should have no place in governing human beings with different sets of beliefs. The role of the government should only be to establish law and order in society, promote equality, and provide services such as public education and health care to its citizens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current News All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group