Search found 11 matches
- Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:56 pm
- Forum: Pronunciation
- Topic: consonant clusters
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12305
Re: Is /y/ a vowel or consonant?
The /y/ sound (also /j/ in some PAs) is phonetically vowel-like, but phonologically it functions, like /w/ and /h/, as a consonant in syllable-initial position at least. Thus: bet, debt, get, het, jet, let, met, net, pet, set, Tet, vet, wet, yet, etc.
- Wed Feb 25, 2004 9:35 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Audiolingual approach
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8421
audiolingual minus
May I add that both the grammar-translation and the audiolingual methods were pruned to some extent - and unfortunately so - on their transference to school and language-institute classroom. The g-t method grew out of the system whereby young gentlemen used to have their personal Latin and French tu...
- Wed Feb 25, 2004 9:32 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Audiolingual approach
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8421
audiolingual minus
May I add that both the grammar-translation and the audiolingual methods were pruned to some extent - and unfortunately so - on their transference to school and language-institute classroom. The g-t method grew out of the system whereby young gentlemen used to have their personal Latin and French tu...
- Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:14 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: 'Come on up from out of under there'- the longest?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3595
longest
The longest I'd heard of before was 'in out from underneath below the table'.
- Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:37 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Do we have Future Tense?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13089
censor
The word for 'fat' is spelt dee-eye-cee-kay, not *beep*!!!
- Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:33 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Do we have Future Tense?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13089
non-existent future
6. THE CASE OF THE NON-EXISTENT FUTURE. 6A. Future Tense? EFL/ESL textbooks will often speak confidently of future tenses, grammars of English will often outline future tenses, and on-line English courses commonly include future tenses. Consequently, most people may be more than a little surprised t...
- Thu Feb 19, 2004 8:37 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: *had went, and other fuddles
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5270
Oops!
Sorry, the bit about 'don't got' in my last post was supposed to come after mentioning that American can make a distinction between 'have you hotten the money?' and 'have you got the money?'. Cheers, john.
- Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:36 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: *had went, and other fuddles
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5270
got/ten
Owing to the inscrutable workings of the language gods, the older 'gotten' is now Standard American, whereas 'got' is now Standard British. It's still mutating, though, as in American Non-Standard 'don't got'.
- Tue Feb 17, 2004 4:58 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: *had went, and other fuddles
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5270
'ad went, like
As a native of the British Isles, I know that the use of the past-tense form in place of the past-participle form is a common feature of - ahem - "uneducated" and/or "working-class" and/or "rural" speech, and has been around for a very long time. It's actually part of a much larger picture. A thousa...
- Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:37 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Split infinitive
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13828
baseform and infinitive
The baseform may have quite a few grammar functions, a notorious case being thge baseform 'cut', which performs four functions: (1) present tense, (2) past tense, (3) past participle, (4) infinitive, and (5) noun. For that reason the term infinitive is still useful. Nor is the complete infinitive ne...
- Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:25 pm
- Forum: Pronunciation
- Topic: To Reduce or Not to Reduce: That is the Question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 19506
Aida Dunnett 2, wouldn't you?
I dislike the term 'reduction', since contractions and the like are not only right and proper, as everyone points out, but more importantly also the perfectly natural, normal, no-tricks application of some basic phonological rules of English which may get overlooked if one only thinks of 'reductions...