Your example of 'fish' as a concept is interesting. What springs to mind when I use the word 'duck'? what about 'Bombay duck'?
Search found 9 matches
- Sat Feb 21, 2004 8:10 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: jumping jack flash
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17485
- Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:06 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: English words with Asian language origins
- Replies: 36
- Views: 20010
Hi, Just a question. Has anyone considered 'char' = tea, or is this now out of favour and therefore inadmissable? Isn't it a loan word that has been anglicised ('ch'a') so placing it in the same group as typhoon and kowtow. Just thought of another one - where would queque be found? (No jokes please!...
- Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:05 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: jumping jack flash
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17485
- Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:45 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: What order is the grammatically correct one?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9758
- Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:36 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: jumping jack flash
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17485
- Wed Feb 18, 2004 3:23 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Having had....
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2693
- Wed Feb 18, 2004 2:57 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Someone ! Please help!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2275
Hi , An interesting question, and one that deserves a proper answer. A traditional ‘hawser-lay’ rope is constructed of three strands. Countless fibres are twisted to form yarns , the yarns are twisted to form strands , the strands form the rope . The twist of the yarns is opposite to the fibres and ...
- Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:18 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: jumping jack flash
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17485
I suspect that Andrew is on the right line. A 'jumping jack' was indeed a firework that was thrown onto the ground and as each coil exploded jumped, giving off bright flashes of light as it did so. The movement of the firework was completely random, uncontrolled. 'Flash' is also a derogatory term fo...
- Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:13 am
- Forum: Business English
- Topic: Verb tense....HELP!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3158
Participle clause
Hi, This is not a tense - it's a participle clause using the past participle to modify the verb (had). Normally the subject of a participle clause is the same as the subject of the main clause of the sentence. Sometimes the participle acts as a 'sentence adverb' - modifying the whole, in other cases...