Search found 9 matches
- Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:20 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Exhibition/s Accommodation Consultant
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1363
Exhibition/s Accommodation Consultant
Hi guys, Which of the following is correct? 1. Exhibitions Accommodation Consultant or 2. Exhibition Accommodation Consultant The role of the consultant is to find hotel accommodation for people attending various exhibitions. I have seen the job title written as in 1., however, then I came across th...
- Wed May 04, 2005 8:02 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: would not have let OR would have not let
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1789
- Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:40 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: would not have let OR would have not let
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1789
would not have let OR would have not let
Hi everyone! :D I came across one problem and need your help as even native speakers of English couldn´t give me a satisfying answer. :( Let´s say we have the following sentence: If I had known it, I wouldn´t have let him do it. If I wanted to write this sentence without the contracted form, should ...
- Thu May 27, 2004 3:00 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
- Tue May 25, 2004 7:00 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
- Mon May 24, 2004 11:38 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
hi larry! well, according to my professor, verbs that typically take the progressive (i.e. activity verbs/ are considered unmarked in the progressive form, as this is their usual form and when used in nonprogressive, they are marked. he is quoting professor Holiday he says. well, might be true from ...
- Thu May 20, 2004 10:59 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
hi larry, hi stephen! thanx for your replies. well, i am not sure about his point of view :cry: , but, if i understand it right, what you are saying is, that all progressive forms are marked, but only present simple forms are unmarked? does it mean, that present progressive, past progressive, presen...
- Wed May 19, 2004 10:50 am
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
hi larry! :) thanx a lot for your explanation, it was very helpful! and as you said, it is important to get the information from someone else as a reinforcement. now i will be more confident in expressing this opinion. and if it is wrong, i will tell my professor that even larry thinks so (just kidd...
- Tue May 18, 2004 2:09 pm
- Forum: Applied Linguistics
- Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4585
Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
hi everyone! :) i desperately need your help! i am going to be asked the following question on monday and i don´t know the answer. :( Which progressive forms are marked and which unmarked? i found only this information: in the opposition simple and progressive, the progressive is the marked member a...