Search found 9 matches

by rebrik
Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:20 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Exhibition/s Accommodation Consultant
Replies: 1
Views: 1363

Exhibition/s Accommodation Consultant

Hi guys, Which of the following is correct? 1. Exhibitions Accommodation Consultant or 2. Exhibition Accommodation Consultant The role of the consultant is to find hotel accommodation for people attending various exhibitions. I have seen the job title written as in 1., however, then I came across th...
by rebrik
Wed May 04, 2005 8:02 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: would not have let OR would have not let
Replies: 4
Views: 1789

Thank you very much! :D
by rebrik
Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:40 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: would not have let OR would have not let
Replies: 4
Views: 1789

would not have let OR would have not let

Hi everyone! :D I came across one problem and need your help as even native speakers of English couldn´t give me a satisfying answer. :( Let´s say we have the following sentence: If I had known it, I wouldn´t have let him do it. If I wanted to write this sentence without the contracted form, should ...
by rebrik
Thu May 27, 2004 3:00 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

hi larry!
yes, that is exactly what i mean. i ve read that in this case, the simple present is marked.
rebrik
by rebrik
Tue May 25, 2004 7:00 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

hi larry hi lolwhites
ok, i will go to him and ask him for the exact explanation, i will write it down and put it here afterwards, btw larry, what about present simple used as a historic present? do you consider it unmarked as well?
rebrik
by rebrik
Mon May 24, 2004 11:38 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

hi larry! well, according to my professor, verbs that typically take the progressive (i.e. activity verbs/ are considered unmarked in the progressive form, as this is their usual form and when used in nonprogressive, they are marked. he is quoting professor Holiday he says. well, might be true from ...
by rebrik
Thu May 20, 2004 10:59 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

hi larry, hi stephen! thanx for your replies. well, i am not sure about his point of view :cry: , but, if i understand it right, what you are saying is, that all progressive forms are marked, but only present simple forms are unmarked? does it mean, that present progressive, past progressive, presen...
by rebrik
Wed May 19, 2004 10:50 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

hi larry! :) thanx a lot for your explanation, it was very helpful! and as you said, it is important to get the information from someone else as a reinforcement. now i will be more confident in expressing this opinion. and if it is wrong, i will tell my professor that even larry thinks so (just kidd...
by rebrik
Tue May 18, 2004 2:09 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Progressive forms - marked/unmarked
Replies: 14
Views: 4585

Progressive forms - marked/unmarked

hi everyone! :) i desperately need your help! i am going to be asked the following question on monday and i don´t know the answer. :( Which progressive forms are marked and which unmarked? i found only this information: in the opposition simple and progressive, the progressive is the marked member a...