Search found 1195 matches

by LarryLatham
Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:43 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: A negative "cause"?
Replies: 7
Views: 1754

Re: A negative "cause"?

The verb cause predominantly has a negative semantic prosody, i.e. it is normally found paired with, or collocated with, nouns that have a negative connotation. Would you say that such an observation is important to language learning, in particular vocabulary learning? ... Here are the first ten ex...
by LarryLatham
Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:35 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Which I also see in some textbooks. Textbooks...schmectbooks! Those have been so wrong so often that I'm afraid I have little faith left in them. (I know I am showing my bias, here, but I simply cannot help myself. It appears to me that the writers of most of the textbooks do almost no thinking for...
by LarryLatham
Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:51 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Not so fast Larry, I've already done the first bit. IMO due to progression of meaning, the natural order is: can, could, may, might, will, would, shall, should, had better, must The question is: is the progression between modals constant? OK, Andy . Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions too fast here. B...
by LarryLatham
Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:40 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Now that I have defined a continuum, I realise that fitting the modals into one requires that: 1) the modals be ordered into a natural progression of meaning, and 2) the change of meaning between each modal is constant and linear too. In this way the modals are analagous to the cardinal numbers. Th...
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:35 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Andy , you've more than earned an unconditional welcome into pretty much any discussion at Dave's, I should think. At any rate, you're welcome here. So are any others who can illuminate this black hole. But I must admit, you're over my head with your post. I've never understood the distinctions bet...
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:15 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Where's the fun in seeing things the same way? Ah yes, how right you are there. Pretty much of a yawn if we all gush over how much we agree. Disagreement between mutually respecting points-of-view is oh-so-much more interesting. I earlier said: I wouldn't disagree that a user can do this. However, ...
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:53 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

I consider you as an equal, and not a student. I am genuinely flattered that you would think so, M56 , as I know you have an advanced degree in linguistics. I, on the other hand, have no formal education or training in linguistics. So I am certainly in a position to be your student, and eager to ab...
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:51 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Well, I don't really quite know what it means. (I'm sure you'll be able to tell me). But it sounds more plausible to me than 'modal certainty'.

I am eager to be your student! But expect challenges. :wink:

Larry Latham
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:17 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

"Modal certainty" next.
I can hardly wait. Sounds like an oxymoron to me!!!:wink:

Larry Latham
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:09 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

By all means, how about some of the usual suspects (or even some new ones) jumping into this debate!!! All opinions (and some facts) are welcome.:wink:

Larry Latham
by LarryLatham
Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:05 am
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: subject verb agreement
Replies: 7
Views: 2433

Re: subject verb agreement

Sentences with "one or more" always take a plural verb. Of course, I'm sure you already know that the general rule of thumb (it's not exactly a "rule" in the classic sense) is that the form normally chosen agrees with the 'proximate' part of "one or more". If the sentence actually were: " In the ve...
by LarryLatham
Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:53 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

:D :D As I said before, M56, I suppose you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

But that's all right. I have loads of respect for your opinions (even if not for your facts :wink: )

Larry Latham
by LarryLatham
Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:44 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

Next time a safari guide says to you something like: You've been bitten by a poisonous snake You must get to a hospital as or to someone with an antidote soon as possible. why not reply "Is that your opinion? See what they say. I would totally expect them to say: "It certainly is." or something els...
by LarryLatham
Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:58 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: till until 'til
Replies: 4
Views: 1749

That's a really excellent observation, Jose . :D I wonder too. Can you think of any reason why these are not two facets of the same gem? One thing I will say is that native speakers generally always prefer unstressed forms unless they are emphasizing something. Also, we are lazy, so almost anything ...
by LarryLatham
Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Forum: Applied Linguistics
Topic: Generic "will".
Replies: 112
Views: 21767

I agree with Lewis' statement about the non-factuality (in the eyes of the speaker) of "will", but he omits to mention that he is referring to categorical fact. Nowhere does he overtly discuss modal fact, i.e. i.e., statements of possibility or necessity. Here are some examples of modal factual sta...