Rating Language Teaching Skills/Methods

<b> Forum for ESL/EFL teachers working with secondary school students </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
aiaxx
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:26 am

Rating Language Teaching Skills/Methods

Post by aiaxx » Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:49 am

I am a modern Language teacher. I have designed this on-line tool for foreign language teachers. It will allow you to figure out the bigger picture. You will be given ratings and feedback on these areas: methodology, activities, grouping, assessment and use of multimedia. Hope you find it helpful.

This is the link.
http://eleyesl.thefreebizhost.com
Last edited by aiaxx on Sun May 15, 2005 2:59 pm, edited 5 times in total.

guest of Japan
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 5:33 am

Post by guest of Japan » Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:28 am

This test is inappropriate for evaluation of teaching in secondary schools in Asia, and especially in Japan.

weakenesses include:
- class size choices
- types of English curriculum
- assumption is made that courses meet at least twice a week and this skews many of the answers
- assumes teachers can speak the native language of the country they live in including having advanced reading skills (pretty far-fetched in countries which use kanji)
- Doesn't factor in time and space limitations
- doesn't factor in expectations from the schools

aiaxx
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:26 am

Post by aiaxx » Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:14 pm

Thanks for your suggestions, Guest of Japan. It is not really easy to make a tool like this, but I am persevarating on the job, just to try to be helpful to Foreign Language Teachers. I would like to review some of your remarks:

- "assumption is made that courses meet at least twice a week and this skews many of the answers".

Actually no assumption is made. It is warned on the main screen that, so far, the group is supposed to be taught 2 or more periods a week in order to take the test. I am working on the program to allow those teachers who teach just one period a week to take the test.

- "assumes teachers can speak the native language of the country they live in including having advanced reading skills (pretty far-fetched in countries which use kanji) "

My point is if the teacher speaks in class the language she/she is teaching (say English), not the one spoken where he/she lives.

- "doesn't factor in expectations from the schools".

Actually, it does. Because I do get a factor to weight those expectations.

The rest of those remarks are also taken into account according to their impact in results. Some of them have very little impact though.

I really appreciate your suggestions.
Last edited by aiaxx on Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

aiaxx
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:26 am

Post by aiaxx » Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:09 am

I have taken into account some suggestions I have received and I have made these improvements: There are two separate options on the home page. One is for those teachers who teach just one period/lesson a week. Timeframes are more flexible. The test also considers the fact that evaluation and/or oral testing might not be on the curriculum.
I would like to thank everyone who has given me feedback through my web site.
Aiaxx : :idea:

Post Reply