Harry Potter

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Harry Potter

Post by metal56 » Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:25 pm

How would you explain the inclusion of "thank you very much.", below, to a student?

Mr. and Mrs. Dursley, of number four, Privet Drive, were proud to say that they were perfectly normal, thank you very much. They were the last people you’d expect to be involved in anything strange or mysterious, because they just didn’t hold with such nonsense (page 1).

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (1997)

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:33 am

This would be very hard to explain to a student who wasn't very familiar with middle-class, suburban England. Basically, I think Ms Rowling was illustrating that the characters in question are nice, normal, rather prim middle class people. It all ties in with the street name and the phrase "didn't hold with such nonsense."

I imagine the teacher would have to be very familiar with the students' own society and think of a cultural equivalent, if one exists. This is a classic example of language which can't be divorced from its social context

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:50 am

lolwhites wrote:This would be very hard to explain to a student who wasn't very familiar with middle-class, suburban England. Basically, I think Ms Rowling was illustrating that the characters in question are nice, normal, rather prim middle class people. It all ties in with the street name and the phrase "didn't hold with such nonsense."

I imagine the teacher would have to be very familiar with the students' own society and think of a cultural equivalent, if one exists. This is a classic example of language which can't be divorced from its social context
Interesting reply. Did you read it as the writer's own words or an example of those of the character/s? I read it as the latter.


One could of course just cite the translated version in the language of the students.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:10 pm

I presume the writer is showing us the kind of language those characters would use to illustrate the point that they're rather prim, conservative (note the small "c") and closed minded.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:25 pm

lolwhites wrote:I presume the writer is showing us the kind of language those characters would use to illustrate the point that they're rather prim, conservative (note the small "c") and closed minded.
Absolutely.

Which verb relates to what above?

Is it: "the writer is showing that they're rather prim, conservative and closed minded."

or:

"the kind of language those characters would use to illustrate the point that they're rather prim, conservative and closed minded."

I presume it is the first meaning because I doubt whether the characters would want to illustrate that they are small minded.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:46 pm

You're right, metal. The writer is showing that the characters are prim and closed minded.

Incidentally, you've just illustrated the importance of context, knowledge of the world and basic common sense in understanding utterances.

JuanTwoThree
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Spain

Post by JuanTwoThree » Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:41 pm

I don't know what it's called but it's quite a common device: a sort of half way to indirect speech.

"I head a voice telling me to turn down the television for crying out loud"

It'll have a name.

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:48 pm

The rhetorical trick of using ostensibly third person dialog to represent the mental map of a character and not the narrator, is sometning *beep* usies all the time.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:06 pm

lolwhites wrote:You're right, metal. The writer is showing that the characters are prim and closed minded.

Incidentally, you've just illustrated the importance of context, knowledge of the world and basic common sense in understanding utterances.
Don't ya just love pragmatics?

8)

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:07 pm

Stephen Jones wrote:The rhetorical trick of using ostensibly third person dialog to represent the mental map of a character and not the narrator, is sometning *beep* usies all the time.
Hoorah for beep.

Post Reply