Parallel : omission of the overlapping part?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
heyiamhere
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:22 am

Parallel : omission of the overlapping part?

Post by heyiamhere » Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:35 pm

Can I omit overlapping parts in parallel structure?

1. Salting has been uses to season as well as (to) preserve food

2. I can go there not only by bus but also (by) train

3. I can go there by bus as well as (by) train

Thanks

JuanTwoThree
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Spain

Post by JuanTwoThree » Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:10 pm

Yes.

heyiamhere
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:22 am

Re: Parallel : omission of the overlapping part?

Post by heyiamhere » Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:21 am

How about this?

1. Salting has been uses[b] (to) season [/b]as well as to preserve food

2. I can go there not only (by) bus but also by train

3. I can go there (by) bus [b]as well as [/b]by train

Thanks[/quote]

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:58 am

No.

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:09 am

Depends :)

heyiamhere
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:22 am

Post by heyiamhere » Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:59 pm

:!: :shock: :!:

Post Reply