Agents without will.

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Agents without will.

Post by metal56 » Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:05 am

Do you use such as these - where no agent possessed of will is in control of the event?

If this rain will just hold off, I can cut the grass.

If my car will start, we can go to the countryside.

If this stupid lid will open..arghh, We can get at the cookies!

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:36 am

Yes, I have no doubt that I have done and still do, but I'm wondering if I and perhaps others might have a preference for 'would' rather than 'will'; then there's possibly additions that get made along the lines of 'If only this damn/****ing...'.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:10 am

<but I'm wondering if I and perhaps others might have a preference for 'would' rather than 'will'; >

What would be the difference in using "would" there?

And would you do this:

If this rain would just hold off, I can cut the grass.

or this:

If this rain would just hold off, I could cut the grass.

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:42 am

Actually I was more thinking about the car and lid examples, and sort of forgot about the rain one. With 'will' (and 'can'), the rain has momentarily stopped and the speaker is hoping that the clear period will hold, but with 'would' (and 'could'), it sounds as though the rain has not actually yet stopped (though it may have done briefly once or several times previously that day), hence the remote form to signal unlikelihood.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:51 am

Metal's examples are fine to my ear, but I think the use of will makes them sound a bit anthropomorphic, as if the rain, car and lid were being stubborn. I'm reminded of Basil Fawlty thrashing his car with a branch :lol:

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:27 am

Metal's examples are fine to my ear, but I think the use of will makes them sound a bit anthropomorphic, as if the rain, car and lid were being stubborn.
LOL! What about "When does the shop open?"

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:30 am

fluffyhamster wrote: With 'will' (and 'can'), the rain has momentarily stopped and the speaker is hoping that the clear period will hold, but with 'would' (and 'could'), it sounds as though the rain has not actually yet stopped (though it may have done briefly once or several times previously that day), hence the remote form to signal unlikelihood.
I agree. So, why would you prefer "would" with the car and lid examples? And why do you imagine others would also prefer "would" in such examples?

Post Reply