Fetus as "doer"?
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
Getting back to 'aborted women', it is unclear if this is just a sort of academic or journalistic shorthand, or actually a term that is used to attract the attention of, and then used amongst, 'women exploited by abortion' themselves.
I'm not a counsellor so I wouldn't presume to tell anybody anything, but if somebody is trying to deal with massive feelings of guilt and regret, won't casting them as (the) victims be a little counter-productive? I wonder how the women themselves feel about the (continual?) use of the term. But I appreciate the possible power/utility of the metaphor in getting people "through the door" at least and into an environment where they can start getting support.
In nature, things can abort if they want - I'm certainly not stopping them LOL.
I'm not a counsellor so I wouldn't presume to tell anybody anything, but if somebody is trying to deal with massive feelings of guilt and regret, won't casting them as (the) victims be a little counter-productive? I wonder how the women themselves feel about the (continual?) use of the term. But I appreciate the possible power/utility of the metaphor in getting people "through the door" at least and into an environment where they can start getting support.
In nature, things can abort if they want - I'm certainly not stopping them LOL.
Not all women who have gone through/chose to have an abortion agree with the term "aborted women".fluffyhamster wrote:Getting back to 'aborted women', it is unclear if this is just a sort of academic or journalistic shorthand, or actually a term that is used to attract the attention of, and then used amongst, 'women exploited by abortion' themselves.
I'm not a counsellor so I wouldn't presume to tell anybody anything, but if somebody is trying to deal with massive feelings of guilt and regret, won't casting them as (the) victims be a little counter-productive? I wonder how the women themselves feel about the (continual?) use of the term. But I appreciate the possible power/utility of the metaphor in getting people "through the door" at least and into an environment where they can start getting support.
In nature, things can abort if they want - I'm certainly not stopping them LOL.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/096489 ... e&n=283155
Could be, but it also could work to the advantage of the pro-life groups. Tell a grieving or regretful woman that she is a victim and was fooled into having an abortion and she may just consider joining your campaign.I'm not a counsellor so I wouldn't presume to tell anybody anything, but if somebody is trying to deal with massive feelings of guilt and regret, won't casting them as (the) victims be a little counter-productive?
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
Oh,I've just read Pauline Chen's 'Final Exam',and was struck (again) by how unfeeling doctors can seem; and it's often interesting to ask how "basic facts" might get expressed differently (more appropriately) given different listeners-or would you consider this outside your and your medical students' "brief"?
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
Not outside at all. In fact, we work with doctor's, getting them to question the language they use in different registers.fluffyhamster wrote: and it's often interesting to ask how "basic facts" might get expressed differently (more appropriately) given different listeners-or would you consider this outside your and your medical students' "brief"?