participles instead of sub.clauses of reason and time

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
Elvis
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Germany

participles instead of sub.clauses of reason and time

Post by Elvis » Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:36 pm

Hi,
I need someone to explain how do we replace the mentioned grammatical point above.
Thanks a lot in advance for any help.
The many examples you will write down the better it will be to understand the case.

Many thanks from the depth of my heart.

Buddhaheart
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:18 am
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada

Post by Buddhaheart » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:41 pm

Look at this complex sentence with an adverb clause of time: I woke up after I heard the noise.
Hearing the noise, I woke up. Hearing is a participle qualifying the pronoun ‘I’. It’s a verbal adjective.

Here’s an example with a sub-clause of reason: I did it because I thought all was safe.
Thinking all was safe, I did it. Thinking is a participle qualifying the pronoun ‘I’. It’s a verbal adjective.

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:06 am

I wonder if it's possible to properly hear something whilst still asleep. :o You could just say that something (e.g. the loud music and/or dog next door) woke you. :)

'Hearing a sound, I got up' however would be fine with this fussy huffy fluffyhamster. :D

Post Reply