from the beginning until now...
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
- Location: Brazil
from the beginning until now...
What do you think of the use of are here, is that ok?
"Last year the number of houses that were robbed increased about 45%. From the beggining of this year until now the number of robbed houses are 450 , 30% higer than last year..."
Thanks
José
"Last year the number of houses that were robbed increased about 45%. From the beggining of this year until now the number of robbed houses are 450 , 30% higer than last year..."
Thanks
José
Intuition or linguistics?
It seems to me that 'is' would be more appropriate. It sounds better to me intuitively and besides 'the number' is singular.
or 'total'
I've been thinking about it... and I think an even better verb to use would be: 'totals'.
"From the beginning of this year until now the number of robbed houses totals 450."
Grammar vs lexis?
"From the beginning of this year until now the number of robbed houses totals 450."
Grammar vs lexis?
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
A number of confusing issues is/are...
John Eastwood, "Oxford Guide to English Grammar":
"When a plural noun follows number of, majority of or a lot of, we normally use a plural verb.
A large number of letters were received.
The majority of people have complained.
A lot of people have complained.
Here a number of etc expresses a quantity.
NOTE
a When number means 'figure', it agrees with the verb.
The number of letters we receive is increasing."
I guess we can infer from "we normally use a plural verb" that data shows both are possible when talking about a 'quantity' (ie. a lot of, a large number of, etc).
Either way in "the number of houses that were robbed" it seems to be a figure (eg. "the 300 houses that were robbed" as opposed to "a lot of houses that were robbed"), so according to Eastwood, at least, 'the number' needs to agree with the verb.
My vote's for "totals"... but I'm still not 100% sure.
"When a plural noun follows number of, majority of or a lot of, we normally use a plural verb.
A large number of letters were received.
The majority of people have complained.
A lot of people have complained.
Here a number of etc expresses a quantity.
NOTE
a When number means 'figure', it agrees with the verb.
The number of letters we receive is increasing."
I guess we can infer from "we normally use a plural verb" that data shows both are possible when talking about a 'quantity' (ie. a lot of, a large number of, etc).
Either way in "the number of houses that were robbed" it seems to be a figure (eg. "the 300 houses that were robbed" as opposed to "a lot of houses that were robbed"), so according to Eastwood, at least, 'the number' needs to agree with the verb.
My vote's for "totals"... but I'm still not 100% sure.
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again