from the beginning until now...

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
Metamorfose
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: Brazil

from the beginning until now...

Post by Metamorfose » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:59 pm

What do you think of the use of are here, is that ok?

"Last year the number of houses that were robbed increased about 45%. From the beggining of this year until now the number of robbed houses are 450 , 30% higer than last year..."

Thanks

José

Heath
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:38 am

Intuition or linguistics?

Post by Heath » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:22 am

It seems to me that 'is' would be more appropriate. It sounds better to me intuitively and besides 'the number' is singular.

User avatar
ouyang
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:52 am
Location: The Milky Way
Contact:

Post by ouyang » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:56 pm

Usually the article that precedes the collective nouns "number" and "majority" determines whether they are plural or singular.

"A number of people are here. The number of people has decreased."

So, I agree with Heath. The singular "is" form would be more appropriate for your sentence.

Heath
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:38 am

or 'total'

Post by Heath » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:31 am

I've been thinking about it... and I think an even better verb to use would be: 'totals'.

"From the beginning of this year until now the number of robbed houses totals 450."

Grammar vs lexis?

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:46 pm

I was toying with 'totals' myself, but decided not to post, because I wasn't sure if 'The number of robbed houses total 450' was "impossible". Has we come full circle? :)

Heath
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:38 am

A number of confusing issues is/are...

Post by Heath » Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:30 am

John Eastwood, "Oxford Guide to English Grammar":

"When a plural noun follows number of, majority of or a lot of, we normally use a plural verb.
A large number of letters were received.
The majority of people have complained.
A lot of people have complained.

Here a number of etc expresses a quantity.
NOTE
a When number means 'figure', it agrees with the verb.
The number of letters we receive is increasing."

I guess we can infer from "we normally use a plural verb" that data shows both are possible when talking about a 'quantity' (ie. a lot of, a large number of, etc).

Either way in "the number of houses that were robbed" it seems to be a figure (eg. "the 300 houses that were robbed" as opposed to "a lot of houses that were robbed"), so according to Eastwood, at least, 'the number' needs to agree with the verb.

My vote's for "totals"... but I'm still not 100% sure.

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:31 pm

Definitely singular verb here. We're talking about one individual number.

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:54 pm

Thanks for clearing that up, Dr Jones! Succinct as ever! :)

Post Reply