object or adverbial

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
joon
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:27 am
Location: Daejun, South Korea

object or adverbial

Post by joon » Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:37 am

(Example) Since New Zealand's Edmund Hillary and Sherpa Tenzing Norgay first reached the top of Mt. Everest on May 29, 1953, about 1,200 other mountain climbers have reached THE PEAK.


I am wandering whether "the peak" is the object or adverbial.

It looks like the object in form.
However, it is translated as an adverbial in my mother tongue(Korean) , because it's a place.

What do you think of it in English view?

Roger
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:58 am

Post by Roger » Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:48 am

Grammar rules of one language cannot always apply to another language.
In your case, the verb REACH requires an OBJECT because it is a so-called TRANSITIVE verb. You cannot say "They reached!" Reached WHAT or WHOM? The answer: The Peak (object).
Adverbials on the other hand are OPTIONAL, and you find them after INTRANSITIVE verbs such as GO:
"They went" would be slightly substandard, although the verb GO is an intransitive verb. Use it in the imperative form "Go!" and contrast this with "Reach..." - clearly, "reach' must be followed by something, for instance "for it".
But we would feel that a verb "went" without anything following it sounds awkward. The place after it should be filled by an adverbial: "They went home' (adverbial of place). "They went at six o'clock" (adverbial of time).

Post Reply