Subjectivity in usage

Xui · Post by **Xui** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:21 pm

fluffyhamster wrote:
Xui wrote:Why must we condense many implications into one sentence, actually one word: SINCE?[/size]
Because it is important and necessary to ponder many implications if we ever want to arrive at an accurate and widely acceptable and useful description of the language.

SINCE.

fluffyhamster · Post by **fluffyhamster** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:27 pm

Xui wrote:
fluffyhamster wrote:
Xui wrote:Why must we condense many implications into one sentence, actually one word: SINCE?[/size]
Because it is important and necessary to ponder many implications if we ever want to arrive at an accurate and widely acceptable and useful description of the language.
SINCE.

Xui · Post by **Xui** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:31 pm

I must say I have expressed my points enough. The thread is closed for me.

fluffyhamster · Post by **fluffyhamster** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

You said exactly the same thing on "The Routine on Yesterday" thread, Xui. It seems you are a pathological "repeater".

I'd like to repeat what I said there also: Don't come back.

Sorry to spoil your fun, metal, but this thread (and Xui generally) was becoming a bit of a drag...

metal56 · Post by **metal56** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 11:08 pm

fluffyhamster wrote:You said exactly the same thing on "The Routine on Yesterday" thread, Xui. It seems you are a pathological "repeater".

I'd like to repeat what I said there also: Don't come back.

Sorry to spoil your fun, metal, but this thread (and Xui generally) was becoming a bit of a drag...

<Sorry to spoil your fun, metal, but this thread (and Xui generally) was becoming a bit of a drag...>

All right, fluff.

fluffyhamster · Post by **fluffyhamster** » Mon Nov 08, 2004 11:13 pm

The fluffmeister can't be a "fluff*r", and keep you "hard" all day now, can he, metal?