Fronting prepositional phrases

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:38 am

Fronting

Elements which are usually found after the verb (i.e. in post-verbal position) can be moved forward to the beginning of a sentence to give them greater prominence. This stylistic device is called
"fronting". Here are some examples:

"A Welshman I was born and a Welshman I shall die." (fronted complement)
"Bloody awful that was." (fronted complement)
"Why don't you take up swimming for relaxation?" "Relaxation you call it." (fronted object)
Some things you forget. Other things you never do. (fronted object)

The main discourse functions of "fronting" are:

•organising information flow to achieve cohesion (i.e. linking directly back to something
that was said before)
•expression of contrast
•enabling particular elements to gain emphasis.

http://www.anglistik.unibonn.de/staff/o ... 1-Gram.pdf

Andrew Patterson
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Patterson » Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:36 am

lolwhites wrote:
Actually, from your sample it appears that Yoda breaks the sentence at the primary auxiliary (if one exists) or failing that the main verb, then fronts everything that comes after.
Actually, if two auxiliaries exist (such as with the future perfect), he keeps both at the front.

Harzer wrote:
For supper we sat in our caravan.
With our hands full, we couldn't move any faster.

I detect something innately contrastive in these sentences, which is what allows them to pass muster.

For three nights we stayed in the hotel, but for the rest of the time we .......
Although we had lunch in a four-star restaurant for supper ..... .
Emptyhanded, we would have managed fine but with our hands full ....

Any thoughts?


Any thoughts indeed :!: Wow Harzer, I think that you are on to something here. Not only does a fronted prepositional phrase on an intransitive verb link to the sentence before it, it also sets up anticipation for what is to follow. What a powerful retorical device this is.

I realised after reading your post, however, that intransitive verbs do not necessarily need a trailing prepositional phrase if they are fronted by another prepositional phrase - it doesn't matter very much what you put after the intransitive verb as long as you put something.

Adapting one of your examples:
For three nights we stayed in, but for the rest of the time we...
This seems easiest with a phrasal verb, but it is possible with a non phrasal verb:
For three days he ran, not knowing where he was, or whether he had escaped his enemies.
This is a little strange because intransitive verbs without any prepositional phrase can quite happily leave a bare verb at the end. It is as if we have an equation that needs balancing.

Metal I like your post too, I can't add much to what you said, though, except that the website that you posted also mentions copular verbs. I think that the rules for fronting for copular verbs are the same for transitive verbs, they are a type of transitive verb, afterall (not sure about this, though, anyone disagree?). You put this thread nicely in context. Everyone should look at your post.

Post Reply