Invisible verb, or not?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Mandy enjoyed the movie.

There is an invisible verb in that structure.
1
25%
There is no invisible verb in that structure.
3
75%
 
Total votes: 4

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:38 pm

Invisible verbs may exist with other catenatives, but they surely must exist with modal equivalents such as "ought to", "be about to", "be on the point of", etc
What examples are you thinking of, Andrew. If it's short phrases like I don't know if he does but he ought to can't you account for that for more simply with back reference and context without resorting to claims of invisible verbs?

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:59 am

lolwhites wrote:
Invisible verbs may exist with other catenatives, but they surely must exist with modal equivalents such as "ought to", "be about to", "be on the point of", etc
What examples are you thinking of, Andrew. If it's short phrases like I don't know if he does but he ought to can't you account for that for more simply with back reference and context without resorting to claims of invisible verbs?
Yes, I would look for anaphor in such examples.

Andrew Patterson
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Patterson » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:37 am

Invisible verbs may exist with other catenatives, but they surely must exist with modal equivalents such as "ought to", "be about to", "be on the point of", etc

What examples are you thinking of, Andrew. If it's short phrases like I don't know if he does but he ought to can't you account for that for more simply with back reference and context without resorting to claims of invisible verbs?


Yes, I would look for anaphor in such examples.
"I don't know if he does, but he ought to," is indeed anaphoric and back-referential, but importantly, it refers back to a verb. "Ought to" cannot exist by itself, it must overlay its meaning on another verb and it does not matter that this verb has been used before.

As to what examples I was thinking of; I regard any catenative that cannot make a sensible sentence without another verb as a modal equivelent. Some other catenatives may be intransitive, and not require an object either, others will require an object or compliment to make sense.

If you want a list of modal equivalents, then look at my Venn diagram, the one I give to my FCE and advanced students, not the unreadable monster that I had before (it still exists, though.) Modal equivalents are written above the headings:

Home page:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson

Coloured diagram:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/Cat.html

Colourless diagram:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/colourless.html

Verb patterns quiz:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/ ... hoice.html

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:44 pm

Andrew Patterson wrote:
Invisible verbs may exist with other catenatives, but they surely must exist with modal equivalents such as "ought to", "be about to", "be on the point of", etc

What examples are you thinking of, Andrew. If it's short phrases like I don't know if he does but he ought to can't you account for that for more simply with back reference and context without resorting to claims of invisible verbs?


Yes, I would look for anaphor in such examples.
"I don't know if he does, but he ought to," is indeed anaphoric and back-referential, but importantly, it refers back to a verb. "Ought to" cannot exist by itself, it must overlay its meaning on another verb and it does not matter that this verb has been used before.

As to what examples I was thinking of; I regard any catenative that cannot make a sensible sentence without another verb as a modal equivelent. Some other catenatives may be intransitive, and not require an object either, others will require an object or compliment to make sense.

If you want a list of modal equivalents, then look at my Venn diagram, the one I give to my FCE and advanced students, not the unreadable monster that I had before (it still exists, though.) Modal equivalents are written above the headings:

Home page:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson

Coloured diagram:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/Cat.html

Colourless diagram:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/colourless.html

Verb patterns quiz:
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/ ... hoice.html
not the unreadable monster that I had before
Well that's a blessing, Andrew.

:)

Andrew Patterson
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Patterson » Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:25 am

Well that's a blessing, Andrew.
Designed to print out on one sheet of A4 paper to boot! :P

Post Reply