a PSAT business

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
JuanTwoThree
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Spain

a PSAT business

Post by JuanTwoThree » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:53 pm

http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/ar-pos1.htm

Apolgies if I'm the last person on earth to find out about this nonsense. For all I know it has been mentioned before .

Does anybody really agree with Mr Keegan?

BTW Brits, did you know that Kevin Keegan was now a high-school journalism teacher?

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:03 am

A lot has been said about agreement on the forum recently - it's a highly flexible thing. Clearly, in this case, the fact that the original noun phrase has a name in it makes the construction run smoothly across our ears, and therefore we would usually judge it correct. Therefore, in a properly descriptive grammar, the "rule" that Mr.Keegan loves must be amended to allow for this.

Post Reply