Page 1 of 1

would not have let OR would have not let

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:40 pm
by rebrik
Hi everyone! :D
I came across one problem and need your help as even native speakers of English couldn´t give me a satisfying answer. :(
Let´s say we have the following sentence:

If I had known it, I wouldn´t have let him do it.

If I wanted to write this sentence without the contracted form, should it be:

If I had known it, I would not have let him do it.
OR
If I had known it, I would have not let him do it.

For me, the first sentence would be more logical (wouldn´t = would not), but also the second one sounds ok to me... :roll:
Could somebody tell me which sentence is correct?
Thank you VERY much! :)

rebrik

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:45 pm
by Stephen Jones
The first is more normal.

You're actually shifing the scope of the negation in the second, but I doubt if it makes any difference to the meaning.

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:11 pm
by rouen_teacher
Sure, the first one you wrote. The negative implication (not) must go before the verb as far as I have read. And, being native, its what I have always heard and written and seen written!
Dan

Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 8:02 pm
by rebrik
Thank you very much! :D

Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 11:15 pm
by woodcutter
I doubt that Dan. Stuff happens, y'know. I mean, even your own final sentence may have broken some strange new ground.