What connection?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

What connection?

Post by metal56 » Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:21 am

What connection, if any, do you all see between the use of the present simple in the sentences below?

The Company is 50 years old next Monday.
Get some sleep, we have a busy day tomorrow.

revel
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:21 am

In both cases....

Post by revel » Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:08 am

Good morning.

In both cases, the statements are reflecting something that the speaker holds to be inalienable truths. Unless Congress acts up, the date that marks the 50th anniversary is fixed and will always be such-and-such a date. Unless there is an act of god, we have to clean the house, look for a birthday present for Kris, buy vegetables and cat food tomorrow, since the day after we are going to be out of town all day and the day after the day after tomorrow we both have to work. I would find the use of any other verb-construct odd in both cases.

peace,
revel.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Re: In both cases....

Post by metal56 » Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:31 am

revel wrote:Good morning.

In both cases, the statements are reflecting something that the speaker holds to be inalienable truths. Unless Congress acts up, the date that marks the 50th anniversary is fixed and will always be such-and-such a date. Unless there is an act of god, we have to clean the house, look for a birthday present for Kris, buy vegetables and cat food tomorrow, since the day after we are going to be out of town all day and the day after the day after tomorrow we both have to work. I would find the use of any other verb-construct odd in both cases.

peace,
revel.
That's interesting. Why do you think you would find these odd?

The Company will be 50 years old next Monday.
Get some sleep, we will have a busy day tomorrow.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Sat Jun 18, 2005 4:42 pm

The difference is emphasis, not meaning, and is the same as the examples on your other thread. It comes down to speaker choice.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:01 pm

lolwhites wrote:The difference is emphasis, not meaning, and is the same as the examples on your other thread. It comes down to speaker choice.
Are those choices based on something? I mean, linguistically speaking. Can they be analysed and discussed?

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:06 pm

They're based on what the speaker wishes to emphasise, and how he or she wishes to present the information.

So, in the examples you've given, it's based on whether he or she wishes to present the info as simple facts or predictions. There are, of course, plently of other possibilities.

The question I ask myself, Metal, is where are you going with this? I'd have thought this was pretty elementary stuff for you. What theory are you testing?

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:56 am

lolwhites wrote:They're based on what the speaker wishes to emphasise, and how he or she wishes to present the information.

So, in the examples you've given, it's based on whether he or she wishes to present the info as simple facts or predictions. There are, of course, plently of other possibilities.

The question I ask myself, Metal, is where are you going with this? I'd have thought this was pretty elementary stuff for you. What theory are you testing?
<
So, in the examples you've given, it's based on whether he or she wishes to present the info as simple facts or predictions.
Just bear with me a while.

Why would the second sentence be seen as a prediction if, at the time of speaking, the speaker knows for a fact that he has a heavy day confronting him?

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:14 am

Why would the second sentence be seen as a prediction if, at the time of speaking, the speaker knows for a fact that he has a heavy day confronting him?
Like I keep saying, it's about the "spin" the speaker chooses to put on the utterance. As to why he or she would want to do that, don't ask me. My mind-reading abilities don't extend far enough to include hypothetical speakers quoted on discussion forums! All I've ever said is that he or she has the option.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:27 pm

lolwhites wrote:
Why would the second sentence be seen as a prediction if, at the time of speaking, the speaker knows for a fact that he has a heavy day confronting him?
Like I keep saying, it's about the "spin" the speaker chooses to put on the utterance. As to why he or she would want to do that, don't ask me. My mind-reading abilities don't extend far enough to include hypothetical speakers quoted on discussion forums! All I've ever said is that he or she has the option.
Fine, thanks for the time.

Post Reply