Generic "will".

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Generic "will".

Post by metal56 » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:00 am

"1. I am a carnivore and a predator though sometimes I will scavenge. I live in the Arctic where I stay by myself most of my life. I am well camouflaged in the snow, though my skin is actually black to absorb the heat of the sun. I will kill and eat seals and walruses, but I will also eat carrion, such as a dead whale. I love water and am such a strong swimmer that I can swim miles at a time. Who am I?"

http://www.rogerwilliamsparkzoo.org/education/hunt.cfm

How would the removal of "will" affect the meaning of the above passage? Would the writer's intended effect still be fully appreciated?

Metamorfose
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: Brazil

Post by Metamorfose » Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:46 pm

It wouldn't affect so much, would it?

Sometimes it is just a matter of style, for what I see in the passage, what the author considers undeniable facts, they use the present simple (I am...I live) and what is still factual (the animal's eating habit) but let's say it is something we (from our point of view) can't predict or measure, then they prefer to turn those sentences into non-factual (using that modal that one famous one will paraphrase 'given my perception of the immediate situation, it is inevitably true that..' ), but again, if they used the present simple it wouldn't make much (if any) different to the regular reader.

Guess I could blow mine and my students' heads with this (mainly for the ones that will is the 'future simple'.)

José

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:34 pm

Metamorfose wrote:It wouldn't affect so much, would it?

Sometimes it is just a matter of style, for what I see in the passage, what the author considers undeniable facts, they use the present simple (I am...I live) and what is still factual (the animal's eating habit) but let's say it is something we (from our point of view) can't predict or measure, then they prefer to turn those sentences into non-factual (using that modal that one famous one will paraphrase 'given my perception of the immediate situation, it is inevitably true that..' ), but again, if they used the present simple it wouldn't make much (if any) different to the regular reader.

Guess I could blow mine and my students' heads with this (mainly for the ones that will is the 'future simple'.)

José

I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.

Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!

They reject such wonderful British English items as:

If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.

(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)

When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.

(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)



And other such delights as:

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:40 pm

metal56 wrote:


I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.

Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!

They reject such wonderful British English items as:

If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.

(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)

When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.

(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)



And other such delights as:
I don't know what other delights you had in mind, but the first one sounds very strange to my ears, and the second one sounds normal. So I scored 50% ;)

--Lorikeet

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:23 pm

Lorikeet wrote:
metal56 wrote:


I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.

Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!

They reject such wonderful British English items as:

If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.

(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)

When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.

(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)



And other such delights as:
I don't know what other delights you had in mind, but the first one sounds very strange to my ears, and the second one sounds normal. So I scored 50% ;)

--Lorikeet

What's your variant of English?

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:37 pm

metal56 wrote:
What's your variant of English?
Sorry--I was born in Detroit, and have lived in San Francisco for 36 years.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:44 pm

I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."

So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:48 pm

Lorikeet wrote:
metal56 wrote:
What's your variant of English?
Sorry--I was born in Detroit, and have lived in San Francisco for 36 years.
Interesting. Another AE speaker who isn't familiar with the emphatic or habitual, persistence and generic quality use of "will".

Puzzled.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:50 pm

lolwhites wrote:I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."

So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
Those who look toward Merriam-Webster, learn.


1 -- used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent, or in negative constructions refusal <no one would take the job> <if we will all do our best> <will you please stop that racket>
2 -- used to express frequent, customary, or habitual action or natural tendency or disposition <will get angry over nothing> <will work one day and loaf the next>
3 -- used to express futurity <tomorrow morning I will wake up in this first-class hotel suite -- Tennessee Williams>
4 -- used to express capability or sufficiency <the back seat will hold three passengers>
5 -- used to express probability and often equivalent to the simple verb <that will be the milkman>
6 a -- used to express determination, insistence, persistence, or willfulness <I have made up my mind to go and go I will> b -- used to express inevitability <accidents will happen>
7 -- used to express a command, exhortation, or injunction <you will do as I say, at once>
intransitive senses : to have a wish or desire <whether we will or no>

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:37 am

Not a very good start to this thread, since the passage quoted has no need at all for "will", it is only a stylistic matter.

Are you suddenly in favour of Stephen Jonesian (orthodox!) multiple meanings, Metal, quoting the dictionary like that?

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:41 am

woodcutter wrote:Not a very good start to this thread, since the passage quoted has no need at all for "will", it is only a stylistic matter.

Are you suddenly in favour of Stephen Jonesian (orthodox!) multiple meanings, Metal, quoting the dictionary like that?
Suddenly? I've always done so.

What is the stylistic reason (if that is the reason) for using "will" there?

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:59 am

I dunno if you can reduce it to just one meaning, but I suspect that with some effort, some of the seven could be got rid of.

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:39 pm

The "will" in the first passage sounds to me like the present tense version of "would" used for nostalgia "I would play in the woods in those days".

Since it is tagged on to sentences already describing habit, it is not necessary for that, the function of the word is to provide a kind of present tense imaginative whimsy. I cannot think of a use for this outside of tedious British parlour games.

LarryLatham
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Aguanga, California (near San Diego)

W

Post by LarryLatham » Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:54 pm

metal56 wrote:
lolwhites wrote:I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."

So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
Those who look toward Merriam-Webster, learn.


1 -- used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent, or in negative constructions refusal <no one would take the job> <if we will all do our best> <will you please stop that racket>
2 -- used to express frequent, customary, or habitual action or natural tendency or disposition <will get angry over nothing> <will work one day and loaf the next>
3 -- used to express futurity <tomorrow morning I will wake up in this first-class hotel suite -- Tennessee Williams>
4 -- used to express capability or sufficiency <the back seat will hold three passengers>
5 -- used to express probability and often equivalent to the simple verb <that will be the milkman>
6 a -- used to express determination, insistence, persistence, or willfulness <I have made up my mind to go and go I will> b -- used to express inevitability <accidents will happen>
7 -- used to express a command, exhortation, or injunction <you will do as I say, at once>
intransitive senses : to have a wish or desire <whether we will or no>
I personally would eschew the M-W catalog of uses, at least in the classroom. It tends to leave students (adult students, at least) with the notion that every word in English has a long list of "particular uses" which must be memorized. It reinforces their conviction that English is a very hard (almost impossible to master) language.

Instead, I prefer to suggest that will has a single function which never varies, though understanding it and applying it requires rather flexible interpretations in particular uses. It always means that the user is speculating, but there may be different reasons for his speculation.

In the case of the passage in M56's original post above, we are reminded that the passage was written by a human being. That human necessarily is speculating about the activities of a polar bear. Had it been written by the bear herself, I imagine the will would be absent, and the effect would be to simply make true statements with no need for speculation.

Larry Latham

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:15 pm

As I said on another thread though, if "will" has a central function, it is highly likely to be the one identified by large groups of unpolluted Americans.

Otherwise, quote that dictionary.

Post Reply