
"commonest" or "most common"?
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
"commonest" or "most common"?
I'm currently a graduate student in Beijing, China. When reading some literature recently, I came upon the use of "commonest" and "most common" by native writers interchangeablely. I just wonder which use is more proper, or both are OK, from the point of view of linguistics. Any help is appreciated!

-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
- Location: Brazil
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
Both are correct and often used.
Two syllable words ending in '-ing' and 'ish' always take more/most.
Those ending in 'y' always take 'er/est'.
There is an increasing tendency for the others to itake 'more/most' but the 'er/est' form is stiil common in words ending, in '-er' (cleverer) 'id' (stupidest) and '-le(abler) '-ow' (mellower) and no doubt others that don't come to mind.
Two syllable words ending in '-ing' and 'ish' always take more/most.
Those ending in 'y' always take 'er/est'.
There is an increasing tendency for the others to itake 'more/most' but the 'er/est' form is stiil common in words ending, in '-er' (cleverer) 'id' (stupidest) and '-le(abler) '-ow' (mellower) and no doubt others that don't come to mind.
Thank all of you for your detailed information and constructive suggestions. Viewing "more/most + adj." is current more prevalent than "adj. + -er/est" when the two forms are juxtaposed, as you suggested, could we possibly say that is a further demonstration of the loss of inflexions, from the point view of linguistics.
Thank for your help! Happy New Year!
Thank for your help! Happy New Year!

-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:30 am
- Location: Spain
One can't always make the facts fit the theories:
"narrower" googles at 9,100,000 and "more narrow" at
653,000.
"narrowest" also beats "most narrow" by 1,910,000 to 653,000
"more common than" 1,690,00 "commoner than" 32,000
"the commonest" 2 million "the most common" 62 million
"more clever" 542,000 "cleverer" 476,000
"more handsome" 195,000 "handsomer" 203,000
So no conclusion except that the -er/est is far from being conclusively less prevalent and is alive and kicking even written down. I would expect it to be even more prevalent in spoken English. There are those that might baulk at writing down "handsomer" but would say it without hesitation .
"narrower" googles at 9,100,000 and "more narrow" at
653,000.
"narrowest" also beats "most narrow" by 1,910,000 to 653,000
"more common than" 1,690,00 "commoner than" 32,000
"the commonest" 2 million "the most common" 62 million
"more clever" 542,000 "cleverer" 476,000
"more handsome" 195,000 "handsomer" 203,000
So no conclusion except that the -er/est is far from being conclusively less prevalent and is alive and kicking even written down. I would expect it to be even more prevalent in spoken English. There are those that might baulk at writing down "handsomer" but would say it without hesitation .