"the best thing to do is"

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
stromfi
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:37 pm

"the best thing to do is"

Post by stromfi » Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:31 am

Could anyone, please, help me out with this phrase? When I use it, I always add an infinitive afterwards. However, there are plenty of examples on Google where it is followed by the base form of the verb. I've grabbed my Michael Swan book (Practical English Usage) to see if it had anything to say on this matter, but I haven't found anything.
Would this phrase be like one of those verbs that can be followed either by infinitive or the base form of the verb without making any difference in the meaning?

Thanks for your help in advance.

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:39 am

I don't know the "rule" but the best thing to do is ask a native speaker. (I can also accept the best thing to do is to ask a native speaker. In fact, the second one sounds more correct, but I'd probably use the first one. Go figure. ;) )

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:35 am

The best thing to do is (to) realise that the two are equally acceptable and completely interchangeable, with no difference in meaning. The worst thing to do is (to) assume that one form must be somehow "better" than the other.

Anuradha Chepur
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: India

Post by Anuradha Chepur » Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:57 am

This is a well known interchangeability and the usage without 'to' is considered as more idiomatic english as confirmed by Lorikeet's preference. As for the "rule", it is a peripheral aspect and not part of core grammar.

Mary W. Ng
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:39 pm

Re: "the best thing to do is"

Post by Mary W. Ng » Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:17 am

Could anyone, please, help me out with this phrase? When I use it, I always add an infinitive afterwards.
You are right in doing so. A to-infinitive functions as a noun, not the bare infinitive (the base form of the verb).

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:43 am

The form without the infinitive appears to be about two and a half times as common. I've just done some sample searches on Google.

I would say it is probably a matter of free choice - I don't think there is any difference of register or formality.

stromfi
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:37 pm

Post by stromfi » Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:07 pm

Many thanks for your replies!

Post Reply