Page 1 of 1

Default form?

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:00 am
by metal56
Conventional pedagogic wisdom states that the written grammar of the language is sufficient for both writing and speaking, i.e. that the written grammar is the "default" form. Do you agree with conventional pedagogic wisdom?

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 9:26 am
by lolwhites
Does it really? I would say "no", given that the earliest writing goes back less than 10,000 years, while speech has been around for as long as humans.

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 1:21 pm
by metal56
lolwhites wrote:Does it really? I would say "no", given that the earliest writing goes back less than 10,000 years, while speech has been around for as long as humans.
Ugg!

Re: Default form?

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:44 am
by Lorikeet
metal56 wrote:Conventional pedagogic wisdom states that the written grammar of the language is sufficient for both writing and speaking, i.e. that the written grammar is the "default" form. Do you agree with conventional pedagogic wisdom?
You mean we should teach our students to speak like we write?

And why "Ugg"?

Re: Default form?

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 5:52 am
by metal56
Lorikeet wrote:
You mean we should teach our students to speak like we write?
I thought that many were already being taught to do exactly that. Isn't it so?
And why "Ugg"?
Neanderthal. Speaking is ancient.