Page 1 of 1
a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:52 pm
by donnach
a - article
bird - noun
in the hand - prep. phrase functioning as adjective modifying bird
is - (linking) verb
worth two - prep. phrase functioning as adverb. (adjunctive adverb?)
in the bush - prep. phrase functioning as an adj. modifying two.
thanks!
donna
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:36 am
by woodcutter
A look at this resource which compiles resources
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/worth
tells us that some clever people see "worth" as a preposition, and some see it as an adjective. Remember what I said about unity and grammarians? Anyway, I see it as an adjective which needs a complement.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:37 am
by donnach
I see it as an adjective which needs a complement
so then is the adjective comlement "two"?
if so, what part of speech is it? noun?
thanks,
donna
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:32 pm
by woodcutter
A noun is necessary for the complement here, I suppose, but it has been left out (i.e it is "birds"). Two is a numeral (or adjective if you like) describing that noun.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:18 pm
by donnach
A noun is necessary for the complement here, I suppose, but it has been left out (i.e it is "birds"). Two is a numeral (or adjective if you like) describing that noun
.
How can an ajective complement be a noun? Shouldn't it be an adverb? If worth is an adjective that requires a complement, its complement should therefore be an adverb.
I'm confused,
Donna
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:39 pm
by woodcutter
I'd imagine that "rule" is why some people would say "worth" in that kind of situation is a preposition. It fits the rule to say so, but it doesn't make any sense.
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:27 am
by donnach
But what do you mean when you say this:
donnach wrote:A noun is necessary for the complement here, I suppose,
.
Why is a noun "necessary"? Is there some rule you are referring to when you say that? That is what I am trying to understand.
Thanks,
Donna
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:58 am
by woodcutter
I just mean I can't imagine a sentence using "worth" in that way, referring to a concrete value, where a noun (one representing a value) is not present or implied. (though you could add "for" at the end and avoid one)
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 6:58 pm
by donnach
Now that I understand adjective, noun, and regular complements this makes more sense.
Thanks for your patience,
Donna