Standard and Poor

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Standard and Poor

Post by woodcutter » Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:31 pm

The OED claims "poor" rhymes with "cure", and even uses the word "poor" as the exemplar of that vowel sound.

For me, the word rhymes with "saw". How about you?

Do you agree that many speakers - including those who are basically RP speakers - use a different pronunciation, making "poor" an ill-chosen word for a chart demonstrating the phonemes of RP?

To my mind "poor" to rhyme with "cure" is upper-class English, and if I say it I seem to be imitating her majesty, and one feels one ought to say "shew" instead of "show" as well. (anyone know the phonetic symbol for the vowel in "shew"?)

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:30 pm

I agree that poor rhymes with saw, but wonder if it may be that in some accents, cure rhymes with both of them? Does the Queen say "cyoor"? I say "cyewer", rhyming with fewer.

Macavity
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:41 pm

Post by Macavity » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:01 pm

"poor" sounds like "lure" to me but not at all like "cure" or "saw"

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:03 pm

For me, poor and saw have the /&#390;:/ vowel while cure and lure have /&#650;&#601;/.

n.b. the phonetic symbols work in my preview, I don't know if they will for everyone else.

Macavity
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:41 pm

Post by Macavity » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:10 pm

My accent has cure with a /j / before the diphthong but none there for lure

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:46 pm

I have a bit of a /j/ in lure too, but it's less pronounced than in cure. I wonder if it can be considered more as a transitional glide between the /k/ at the back of the mouth and the /&#650;&#601;/, which is more central.

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:15 am

I'm sorry, I should have perhaps made it clear that for the OED there is a y or /j/ sound after the consonant in "cure", while in poor there is not (for that would make "pure").

Where are you from again Macavity? Poor is said in the way the OED describes in some places in the North of England, I believe. (sometimes with a very pronounced split in the oo-uh so it sounds like two vowels)

I'm from East Anglia but have a Surrey family background. It's always hard to try and think what is said in an East Anglian accent because there are always people mixing it up with RP (or other accents) and little dialect consciousness in the region, and of course variety within the region too, but I think you can often hear both pronunciations there.

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:25 am

pure and cure are the same for me, and poor is just like pure without the "y", so for me they rhyme.

Post Reply