possibly=possible

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

possibly=possible

Post by fluffyhamster » Wed May 26, 2010 3:00 pm

Have you noticed people using -ble for -bly? (I have. (Hey, I mean noticed, not used! :lol: :D )). What's going on? Are they idiots possible?

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Thu May 27, 2010 11:10 am

That is another member of the "bound to happen sometimes" class, to my mind. The language is full of mistakes that happen a lot, and now and again they take off and move on a road to becoming legit. I don't think this one is on that road, or I haven't heard it at least.

For example I wrote "I have being learning piano for 7 months" on the board the other day, and my intuitive radar just would not seem to bleep "wrong". I later looked it up and there are over 400 hits for such constructions.

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Sun May 30, 2010 4:48 pm

Hiya Woody! Sorry for the delay in responding. :)

I'm not so sure that it's quite as care-less a mistake as, say, "it's for its", but then it would help if the last example that I can recall of "-ble for -bly" hadn't appeared alongside (and thus compounded!) "it's for its" on a webpage advertising ELT cert courses (INTESOL's, to be precise!).

Anyway, my theory is that people are reading the -e of -ble as acute (a la French)! :o :lol: :D

Post Reply