Post
by Roger » Mon Nov 24, 2003 2:01 pm
Pamela,
I too teach in China, have been doing this for almost nine years. I well understand your predicament.
Your situation has two problems:
a) Teaching large classes, and giving them an exam;
b) thinking about your contribution to this sort of community.
I will deal with B) first.
Don't take your job too seriously. If you appluy common sense to China and its education system, you should immediately notice English is an also-ran as a subject, not regarded as a useful skill but much rather as one of many subjects in which students have to pass exams. Exams are the A and the O to a golden career.
Check how teachers in past exams discharged their responsabilities - and you will see an inordinately high number of students passed. Where are they now? Right - you may have rubbed shoulders with some of them, not knowing they passed an exam - their English is next to zero.
Fact is that in China guanxi alone decides how many students make it past the post. If your charges fail in their exam, the school will come down on you, not them. You will have to modify requirements to suit laggards' needs to pass the exam! Sad but true.
As a matter of fact, I had some very good classes, and I designed my exams in a more Western fashion. Several failed - and the school upgraded their scores!
Let's agree in passing that for a teacher to have to give her own students an exit exam is unprofessional. I only believe in exams done by teacher colleagues that don't know my own students - no special favours and relationships, please! But this is China, and that's why 95 out of 100 can't communicate in English in spite of having "studied" the lingo for up to ten years!
So, what about my answer to A)?
As hinted above, design an exam based on what you taught them over the past term. I don't know your students' level, so it's difficult to come up with concrete help.
I had normal school students, and I expected them to respond naturally in situations typical of anywhere, in which the students had to communicate with me in English. I wrote a question each on five different pieces of paper, and the student whose turn it was to come to the exam had to draw one of those five slips of paper.
She had then ten minutes to mull it over in a separate room, where I allowed them to consult reference works.
Then, each student had two minutes to talk as much as she could, failing which would prompt me to ask pointed questions.
I asked, for instance, "you arrive by train in town X, to visit a friend of yours; you find out you left your friend's address behind. What are you going to do?"
Well, that was a difficult one for my college students, but they actually did quite well - most of them. But then again, my criteria were:
- Speak coherently and logically, using adequate English;
- speak in whole sentences;
- grammar;
- address the question;
- use a minimum of 50 words.
Just an idea. The school will set no parameters except later when they will tell you that at least nine students of every ten must have passed the exam...
They won't even second someone to help you with the exam.
it is going to be nothing but a show - even if it scares the hell out of your poor students!