Which is grammatically correct?
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
Possession
Dear All
The funny thing , in my opinion, is that most grammar books are not conclusive about this subject. I mean, they use words like: " We often/usually use the ´s ..." , " We use the ´s especially when..."
Well, this is the opinion of a non-native speaker.
Prescher
The funny thing , in my opinion, is that most grammar books are not conclusive about this subject. I mean, they use words like: " We often/usually use the ´s ..." , " We use the ´s especially when..."
Well, this is the opinion of a non-native speaker.
Prescher
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
Okay, so you think it's wrong. Would you like to offer a solution to prescher's problem?Stephen Jones wrote:Dear dduck,
I was replying to Preyscher not to his students. This is a teachers' forum not a students' one.
Prescher seems to be under the impression that he can teach his students to say "the car of John" instead of "John's car". THIS IS INCORRECT.
Iain
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
Prescher knows his students better than I do. Moreover he knows the texts they are using. What he must not do is teach them an obviously wrong construction that they will not get out of their heads later on.
The different uses of 's' in English provide no end of problems. And the "morpheme studies" research carried out in the eighties suggests that you cannot reproduce certain morphemes until you have mastered others.
My advice would probably be to teach it more for recognition, and not to be too bothered by mistakes.
The different uses of 's' in English provide no end of problems. And the "morpheme studies" research carried out in the eighties suggests that you cannot reproduce certain morphemes until you have mastered others.
My advice would probably be to teach it more for recognition, and not to be too bothered by mistakes.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:10 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
possessives
Hi all
Looks like the choice between The Bride of Frankenstein and The French Lieutenant's Woman is more difficult than you'd first think
On the question of the disappearing apostrophe in the UK: when I raised it earlier I thought I read it in some journalistic article on language change; but it turns out that I'd taken an article in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language a bit further than it intended.
After discussing how uncertain the use of the apostrophe had been since its introduction from the French in the 16th century, the article goes on to say that in recent times commercial practice in the UK has been increasingly to omit the possessive apostrophe from book titles and company names. What had stuck in my my mind was the phrase: "the bias is definitely towards ommission".
Later, however, the article says: there are many occasions when the ... apostrophe expresses a valuable written distinction, and there is strong pedagogical pressure on children to maintain its use, especially in the USA". Sorry, dduck, if I had you worrying nights about apostrophe being surreptitiously hijacked throughout the UK.
Keep up the discussion, folks. Every post is adding another nuance to our understanding of what we loosely call the possessive.
Norm
Looks like the choice between The Bride of Frankenstein and The French Lieutenant's Woman is more difficult than you'd first think

On the question of the disappearing apostrophe in the UK: when I raised it earlier I thought I read it in some journalistic article on language change; but it turns out that I'd taken an article in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language a bit further than it intended.
After discussing how uncertain the use of the apostrophe had been since its introduction from the French in the 16th century, the article goes on to say that in recent times commercial practice in the UK has been increasingly to omit the possessive apostrophe from book titles and company names. What had stuck in my my mind was the phrase: "the bias is definitely towards ommission".
Later, however, the article says: there are many occasions when the ... apostrophe expresses a valuable written distinction, and there is strong pedagogical pressure on children to maintain its use, especially in the USA". Sorry, dduck, if I had you worrying nights about apostrophe being surreptitiously hijacked throughout the UK.
Keep up the discussion, folks. Every post is adding another nuance to our understanding of what we loosely call the possessive.
Norm
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:10 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
possession
Sian
I guess that would also be the opinion of the French lieutenant's woman.
Cheers.
Norm
I guess that would also be the opinion of the French lieutenant's woman.
Cheers.
Norm
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 2:48 pm
a good read in cases of angst
Dear all,
I'm new to this site and find it most encoraging to see how teachers all over the world take time to help each other.
There is a great book called "Grammar for English Language Teachers" which gives a comprenhensive explanation of the subject in question. To write it here would be a long and useless task for you may want to get it for further referrence.
the ISBN is 0 521 477972
However, unless I'm very much misstaken, when " 's " belongs to the verb to be, as in "John's a mule", it is followed by the det. "a" and when it represent "possession" (john's mule) it is not. That could be a clue for your students to distinguish between them.
Hope it helped
I'm new to this site and find it most encoraging to see how teachers all over the world take time to help each other.
There is a great book called "Grammar for English Language Teachers" which gives a comprenhensive explanation of the subject in question. To write it here would be a long and useless task for you may want to get it for further referrence.
the ISBN is 0 521 477972
However, unless I'm very much misstaken, when " 's " belongs to the verb to be, as in "John's a mule", it is followed by the det. "a" and when it represent "possession" (john's mule) it is not. That could be a clue for your students to distinguish between them.
Hope it helped
Re: a good read in cases of angst
Yes, it's a start.Jimmytrain wrote:However, unless I'm very much misstaken, when " 's " belongs to the verb to be, as in "John's a mule", it is followed by the det. "a" and when it represent "possession" (john's mule) it is not. That could be a clue for your students to distinguish between them.
'John's a mule' = John is + noun
But, how about
'John's red' = John is + adjective
'John's gone red' = John has + past participle.
And then we get to
"John's red car ..."
Iain
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 7:14 am
- Location: Seoul