| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Hector_Lector 
 
 
 Joined: 20 Apr 2004
 Posts: 548
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 11:22 am    Post subject: Royal Wedding - Bollocks, or what? |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Do we really need this nonsense? |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| anthyp 
 
  
 Joined: 16 Apr 2004
 Posts: 1320
 Location: Chicago, IL USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 2:39 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Yes, otherwise you'd have nothing to post about in this forum. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Mouse 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Dec 2003
 Posts: 208
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 3:08 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| And lo it was decreed, "if you were any sharper, you'd cut yourself". 
 Does anyone else think that if we pay our taxes, we should be entitled to some of the wedding dinner?  They could send it out in little tupperware boxes...  Or even better, I could go and sit at the big posh table (being somewhat regal myself): wouldn't it be absolutely brilliant to start a foodfight?  The king starts his speech, turns towards a shrill whistle and cops a face full of blancmange! (sp?)  Is that not the stuff dreams are made of?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| grahamb 
 
  
 Joined: 30 Apr 2003
 Posts: 1945
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 9:20 am    Post subject: Royal weddings |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Anyone remember when Charlie Bigears married the sacrificial heifer? Now that was a waste of time and money. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Mouse 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Dec 2003
 Posts: 208
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 5:01 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Uhh... what have you got in your pipe today, grahamb?  So, did anyone watch the Royal Wedding, then?  It was playing on all TVs at the gym, so I had no choice.  I have to say, though, that they did seem genuinely... happy. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Hector_Lector 
 
 
 Joined: 20 Apr 2004
 Posts: 548
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 5:19 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| And it rained - hee hee hee! |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Alex Shulgin 
 
 
 Joined: 20 Jul 2003
 Posts: 553
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 23, 2004 5:19 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Would I prefer to have Elizabeth II or George W Bush as the leader of a country? I'll have to think about that for a very long time.... |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| johnslat 
 
  
 Joined: 21 Jan 2003
 Posts: 13859
 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 23, 2004 5:55 pm    Post subject: Queen's Reich |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Dear Alex Shulgin, Heck, I wouldn't. Give me the Queen - or for that matter, ANY queen - over Bush any day.
 Regards,
 John
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| JosephP 
 
 
 Joined: 13 May 2003
 Posts: 445
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 24, 2004 12:14 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Would that include Pricilla, Queen of the Desert? Shoot, he/she would be better than the smirking chimp that currently dosses down at 1600 Pennsylvannia Avenue. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| grahamb 
 
  
 Joined: 30 Apr 2003
 Posts: 1945
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 24, 2004 8:38 am    Post subject: Take me to your leader. |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| As Mr Zimmerman would say, don't follow leaders. As a lesser of evils, I'd settle for Fidel. He actually has a brain. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |