| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| johnslat 
 
  
 Joined: 21 Jan 2003
 Posts: 13859
 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Regarding that overlap, I find it simpler/more simple to tell students that there are some adjectives that can be compared using either rule, but that rather than memorizing those exceptions, they should just follow the rule (i.e. more polite instead of politer) since the rule works all the time. 
 By the way, those two syllable adjectives on the list that end in "y" have their own rule:
 
 Change the "y" to "i" and add "er," "est" - happy, happier, happiest.
 
 It's "easier" that way
  . 
 Regards,
 John
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| lucia79 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Jun 2011
 Posts: 156
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:10 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Here's a post about the usage of more bitter vs. bitterer and also bitterest. 
 http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003794.html
 
 
 
--Bitterest Battles In The War On Error 
	  | Quote: |  
	  | If you feel strongly one way or the other on this bitter debate, register your voice in this poll hosted by UsingEnglish.com. Last I checked, 16% have voted for bitterer/bitterest, 38% for more bitter/bitterest, and 46% for more bitter/most bitter. |  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| GMark 
 
 
 Joined: 02 Apr 2010
 Posts: 46
 Location: China
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 9:22 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| IMHO 'most bitter' not only sounds better, but using it would help English learners avoid the grammar police outside the classroom.  This is important to many non-native speakers who want to fly under the radar. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| judoka 
 
 
 Joined: 28 Jan 2009
 Posts: 53
 Location: North Pole
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:27 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| That grammar site recommended is awesome.  http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/ .  I am now looking into ordering some of the books recommended.  I'll probably order them through amazon. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| microbabe 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Feb 2010
 Posts: 115
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:07 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
 My vote is for Murphy !
    |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| spiral78 
 
  
 Joined: 05 Apr 2004
 Posts: 11534
 Location: On a Short Leash
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:09 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| fourth, fifth, and sixth for MURPHY!   (wish I got a slice of the royalties on this one - I've been recommending it for ages).  Hey, Raymond, if you're listening.....
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| MotherF 
 
 
 Joined: 07 Jun 2010
 Posts: 1450
 Location: 17�48'N 97�46'W
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:35 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| If you're having trouble explaining grammar, you might want to try changing the way you think about grammar's role in second language learning. I recommend reading the works of Michael Lewis. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| fluffyhamster 
 
 
 Joined: 13 Mar 2005
 Posts: 3292
 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:26 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| The "problem" with Lewis is that he's concentrated mainly on just the verb system (in his primary work The English Verb), wants to shake up the terminology a bit (probably too much for most people's tastes), and above all stresses that his explanations are more to aid teacher understanding at a deeper level than anything that can be applied in any reasonably straightforward way. So I'm always a little wary of recommending him too unreservedly to practising classroom teachers. That being said, his ideas certainly offer an alternative to the catalogues of "rules and exceptions" that can abound in standard approaches. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| sainthood 
 
 
 Joined: 15 Nov 2010
 Posts: 175
 Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:27 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | marmot wrote: |  
	  | I'm also interested in a good grammar book as a reference. I looked into Martin Parrott's book but it seems the book is entirely based on British English. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but as an American it wouldn't feel natural to me. Does anyone know of a good grammar book that is American based? |  
 What?? Americans use a different grammar to British???? I never knew that one! (vocab - yes, spelling - yes ... grammar - no).
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| spiral78 
 
  
 Joined: 05 Apr 2004
 Posts: 11534
 Location: On a Short Leash
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:10 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Ah, heavens, someone's going to trot out that tired old 'have vs. have got' thing about now.... |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| johnslat 
 
  
 Joined: 21 Jan 2003
 Posts: 13859
 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:52 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Dear spiral78, 
 Tee-hee - you just did.
 
 Shall we present a few more examples?
 
 Regards,
 John
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| spiral78 
 
  
 Joined: 05 Apr 2004
 Posts: 11534
 Location: On a Short Leash
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Dear John: 
 I was hoping to at least circumvent its being presented as a new discovery or as something that's truly radically different about the grammatical structures used.
 I hope I succeeded; my aims were modest.
 
 Sure, fire away on the others.
 
 Best,
 spiral
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Sashadroogie 
 
  
 Joined: 17 Apr 2007
 Posts: 11061
 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:37 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | johnslat wrote: |  
	  | Dear spiral78, 
 Tee-hee - you just did.
 
 Shall we present a few more examples?
 
 Regards,
 John
 |  
 Dear Johnslat
 
 This should of course be "You've just done so." Otherwise I shan't be able to communicate with you as your dialect will be impenetrable to me : )
 
 
 Best wishes
 
 Sasha, hic!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| johnslat 
 
  
 Joined: 21 Jan 2003
 Posts: 13859
 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:41 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Dear Sasha, 
 Hmm, that's a bad case of the hiccups you've got. Perhaps you had better go to hospital. Is there one in your street?
   
 Ta,
 John
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Sashadroogie 
 
  
 Joined: 17 Apr 2007
 Posts: 11061
 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:20 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Dear Johnslat 
 Eh? Wha' tha'? Didn't quite catch ya, if ya get my drift, innit?
 
 
 Hic, Sasha.
 
 
 PS, there is a hospital on my street actually, but wouldn't want to be caught dead in it.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |