|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| whitehouse wrote: |
There are too many foreigners with vested interests who are not entirely upfront about the merits or otherwise of foreign courses to which they are associated. Chinese parents should beware of spending a lot of money on foreign courses some of which are useless. |
If this is a warning to Chinese parents, I'm afraid you are preaching to the wrong audience. This audience is more likely to have those (as you called them) "foreigners with vested interests who are not entirely upfront" so not sure who your target audience is with all this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whitehouse
Joined: 06 Mar 2008 Posts: 31 Location: CHINA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is not necessary to wish to convert anyone to ones point of view. Blogging never does this anyway and it is rare that opinions are changed by blogging. I am observing that if Chinese parents took note of rankings then they are less likely to waste money on a poor education for their children.
The previous comment to mine stated "What I do object to is the unreasonable prices that universities in the UK and the US charge ".
That is an observation . Do you think his target audience is the people who set the prices in the UK or US? Of course not. Most blogs are concerned with making observations and only idiots expect to change the world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slapntickle
Joined: 07 Sep 2010 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Miles Smiles wrote: |
| I mentioned in the other thread about this supposed endemic problem in western education that there are entities in the U.S. that audit school records to ensure that rules are being followed. |
If regulatory agencies worked well and did their job thoroughly, there wouldn't be any problems. However, regulatory agencies are populated by people who are happy to turn a blind eye if palms are greased. Much of the for-profit sector has been regulated by one of the six regional accrediting organisations for higher education in the US, but there are scandals breaking every week.
In the UK too, regulators aren't doing their jobs. There have been numerous stories in the news recently about scandal and fraud breaking out like a virus. A story that is now breaking at the BBC is about 50,000 bogus international students who have entered the UK not to study but to work. The body that regulates the British borders, the UKBA, is obviously not doing its job. So much for regulation.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2120729/Student-visa-fiasco-revealed-handed-goes-worker.html?ito=feeds-newsxml |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miles Smiles

Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1294 Location: Heebee Jeebee
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That story is about immigrations control, not about education.
"...The National Audit Office estimates that around one in six of student visas granted went to workers whose intention was to take jobs..."
Nobody can verify what someone's true intent might be until the person in question does what he says he intends to do or does something different.
In the case of Dickinson University, the Powerz That Bee found the problem. If one knows about such problems at other universities, then he has a responsibility to report that university.
Got any more examples? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slapntickle
Joined: 07 Sep 2010 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Miles Smiles wrote: |
| Got any more examples? |
I'm merely noting that even the most powerful regulators, in this case the UKBA, are useless most of the time. And for your information there is a relationship between international students, immigration and education . . . or am I missing something?
The recent scandal at Dickinson State University in North Dakota is indicative of what has been going on in the private for-profit sector for years now in the US. Admittedly government schools have been better regulated, but now that funds are tight they are having to make up the shortfall by selling degrees in order to survive. A recent article has this to say:
But as an audit made public Friday revealed, lax recordkeeping and oversight resulted in hundreds of degrees being awarded to students who didn't finish their course work. Others enrolled who couldn't speak English or hadn't achieved the "C" average normally required for admission.
The report depicts Dickinson State as a diploma mill for foreign students, most of whom were Chinese. Of 410 foreign students who have received four-year degrees since 2003 � most of them in the past four years � 400 did not fulfill all the graduation requirements, it said.
The report raises questions about whether public universities, strapped for cash at a time of sharply declining state support for higher education, are cutting corners to attract foreign students who typically pay full out-of-state tuition. It also comes amid an unprecedented boom in the number of Chinese students studying at U.S. universities.
Dickinson State could face penalties from the U.S. State Department for violations of the federal student visa program, as well as sanctions from the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security and the Higher Learning Commission in Chicago, an accreditation agency, the report said.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/10/dickinson-state-universit_n_1269667.html
The report states that the problem occurred because of "lax recordkeeping and oversight". Really? I don't think so. I think the University was simply hedging its bets at a time when funds were short, hoping that its immoral behaviour would not be picked up be the regulator. Unfortunately for the opportunists at DSU, they got caught this time. But it was worth a gamble. After all, they'd probably been getting away with such transgressions for years. And I presume they'd have continued to break the law if they hadn't been stopped short in their tracks by a whistle-blower?
Hopefully DSU will face penalties imposed by the US State Department for violating the federal student visa program . . . that is, of course, if a correlation can be found between students(education) and visa program(immigration)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miles Smiles

Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1294 Location: Heebee Jeebee
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
"...The report says recruiters in China passed themselves off as Dickinson State employees, altering genuine school business cards to print their own with the title, "DSU China Center."
Students were promised they could earn their Dickinson State degree before finishing classes at their home university and the freedom to change their majors or classes as they pleased, which the audit says violated the terms of the dual-degree program...."
Wow. There's a China connection. Gosh, I'm so surprised.
So far we've been presented with one case in the U.S. that involves Chinese students, and another in the U.K. that involves illegal aliens, not students. Any other info that resembles empirical data?
FWIW, the Huffington Post is a blog that deals almost entirely in overblown editorial commentary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whitehouse
Joined: 06 Mar 2008 Posts: 31 Location: CHINA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
No,we have had 3 examples of very poor service to Chinese students. In the example I gave of teaching for a UK university in China I did something about it and sent an email to the University Pro Vice Chancellor and to her credit she did something about it. The UK lecturer who I reported, amongst other things, to the VC for setting a 21 question MCQ which was supposed to be 20 questions, with 2 questions entered twice in this test is ,I see, no longer with the University.
I am blogging here, which I do rarely because I no longer work in China .
It is not in the interests of those in China who are working in the system to write about such matters. Many of the students who are doing foundation courses for big groupa end up at low ranking UK universities which otherwise would be short of students.There are 100s of Chinese students at low ranking British universities who will gain little from the expense and experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slapntickle
Joined: 07 Sep 2010 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Miles Smiles wrote: |
| So far we've been presented with one case in the U.S. that involves Chinese students, and another in the U.K. that involves illegal aliens, not students. Any other info that resembles empirical data? |
The reason you've been presented with one case is that this case was exposed by a brave whistle-blower. If more employees had the courage to blow the whistle on corrupt employers, then they'd be more scandals breaking. But employees don't usually go public because they're afraid of losing their jobs. So people just zip it and deny the unethical practices that are going on around them. I predict that as funds become tighter and universities in both the UK and the US become uncertain about future funds, more scandals are going to break. But until some brave soul goes out on a limb and blows the whistle, the scandals remain off the radar.
| Quote: |
| FWIW, the Huffington Post is a blog that deals almost entirely in overblown editorial commentary. |
OK then, will you accept Business Week?
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-12/north-dakota-school-awarded-unearned-degrees-state-says.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miles Smiles

Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1294 Location: Heebee Jeebee
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's the same school. One school doesn't represent an endemic problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| whitehouse wrote: |
| There are too many foreigners with vested interests who are not entirely upfront about the merits or otherwise of foreign courses to which they are associated. Chinese parents should beware of spending a lot of money on foreign courses some of which are useless. |
There are too many local educational institutions that accept foreign programs, teachers and students for a sole purpose called FAST MONEY. They, the institutions, enroll anyone with money regardless their skills, talent or previous achievements. Further more, they make little attempt to upgrade their academic environment which often compromises teachers' and students' effort. Therefore, what Chinese parents ought to be aware of is their own dishonest schools and educators that are unwilling to adjust to western standards and make long term investments in the offered programs, and then what they must pay attention to is the large numbers of institutions that appear and disappear with foreign academic programs which is for good reasons that i have just indicated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slapntickle
Joined: 07 Sep 2010 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Miles Smiles wrote: |
| It's the same school. One school doesn't represent an endemic problem. |
Please read my post again carefully and you might start to get the gist of what's going on:
The reason you've been presented with one case is that this case was exposed by a brave whistle-blower. If more employees had the courage to blow the whistle on corrupt employers, then they'd be more scandals breaking. But employees don't usually go public because they're afraid of losing their jobs. So people just zip it and deny the unethical practices that are going on around them. I predict that as funds become tighter and universities in both the UK and the US become uncertain about future funds, more scandals are going to break. But until some brave soul goes out on a limb and blows the whistle, the scandals remain off the radar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| whitehouse wrote: |
It is not necessary to wish to convert anyone to ones point of view. Blogging never does this anyway and it is rare that opinions are changed by blogging. I am observing that if Chinese parents took note of rankings then they are less likely to waste money on a poor education for their children.The previous comment to mine stated "What I do object to is the unreasonable prices that universities in the UK and the US charge ".
That is an observation . Do you think his target audience is the people who set the prices in the UK or US? Of course not. Most blogs are concerned with making observations and only idiots expect to change the world. |
Your objection to the unjust tuition fees at the US or UK unis is not the only one and questioning their current value is, in my opinion, well-founded. However, if your complaint is about the rich Chinese parents that are unsure about where to put their money and that the western education isn't the right place, your whining is groundless. And, for your information, blogging offers views that the media is often unable to provide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| whitehouse wrote: |
No,we have had 3 examples of very poor service to Chinese students. In the example I gave of teaching for a UK university in China I did something about it and sent an email to the University Pro Vice Chancellor and to her credit she did something about it. The UK lecturer who I reported, amongst other things, to the VC for setting a 21 question MCQ which was supposed to be 20 questions, with 2 questions entered twice in this test is ,I see, no longer with the University.
I am blogging here, which I do rarely because I no longer work in China .
It is not in the interests of those in China who are working in the system to write about such matters. Many of the students who are doing foundation courses for big groupa end up at low ranking UK universities which otherwise would be short of students.There are 100s of Chinese students at low ranking British universities who will gain little from the expense and experience. |
And i thought that rich Chinese students were patronized all the way. Most of them are ill prepared as a courtesy of their homeland's educational system. The fact that foreign teachers and professors try to help them should be hailed, not despised. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miles Smiles

Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1294 Location: Heebee Jeebee
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How can one say that charging a foreign student more for a western education is unjust? American students pay more to attend a school that's in a state state other than the one in which they live. They pay even more if they attend a foreign school. It's that way for every foreign student everywhere.
Injustice would be to force a foreign student to attend a particular school in the U.S. when he doesn't want to come to the U.S. at all. Imposing higher tuition for foreign students isn't unjust. It is a very common practice. I would have loved to have attended Harvard, Stanford, or Columbia for my BA studies. My SAT scores would have gotten me in, but my parents couldn't afford the tuition. Is that injustice too?
Nobody forces Chinese students to come the the U.S.. Not every Chinese student who applies to American Universities MAY be admitted. Math, Engineering, and the Science departments at top tier universities usually have a quota for Chinese students that cannot be surpassed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alright. Let's polarize.
Yes, it is a blatant discrimination. A foreigner pays more and what's more s/he must achieve a higher score on SAT. Oh, what's more is that s/he doesn't have to really be a "foreigner" but someone with a different color of skin. Come on! Wake up!
But I agree that nobody makes foreigners apply for higher education abroad. The adverts or foundation courses offered globally only suggest that there is an interest.
In any case, there ought to be justice and selective process rather than pointing fingers to directions where one comes from. If there is only a handful suitable, then go with it. Seeking job opportunities, for example in the US, there are some illegal questions to aks at interviews. It's time to follow up in higher education as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|