|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
desert_traveller
Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 7:16 am Post subject: Why are 'native speaker' teachers not required to do IELTS? |
|
|
My last employer had a policy of requiring all non-native English teachers to get 8.0 or higher (!) in IELTS so that they can teach level sub-zero Saudi vocational trainees English.
You may ask why they had to do a test, and why they had to get such an impressive score in IELTS? It's like, asking for a PhD in maths to supervise kids playing with building blocks in a kindergarten.
But another equally valid question may be, why only the non-native speakers? And the funny thing was, it wasn't even the non-native speakers, basically it was passport holders from countries where English is not the first language. There was a guy there with a British passport, Asian origins, no one ever understood a word of what he said. No IELTS was required from him.
The underlying assumption is that all British and American passport holders are also native speakers of English. Paradoxically, it is exactly these countries that also have huge (and ever growing) migrant communities, for which there is a higher than average probability that a passport holder is NOT a native speaker. If it should ever be questioned whether a passport holder is a native speaker, it is exactly these countries that are concerned.
Once I had to sign reports asking for disciplinary action submitted by classroom teachers, and I can distinctly remember one that was written by a native native speaker (no typo there) that I struggled to make any sense of. That teacher would not have passed PET, let alone 8 in IELTS.
If any company is serious about quality, they would not ask for native speakers, or if they did, they would insist on being an actual native speaker, as opposed to holding this or that passport. But since even being a native speaker does not guarantee language proficiency, if they were really serious about quality, they would ask for a 7, 8 or 9 in IELTS from ALL applicants, depending on the actual job. 7 for vocational training, 8 for uni prep year, 9 for IELTS prep etc. That would be a more reliable predictor of language proficiency and thus suitability for a particular job role than any passport.
But, yes, I know, the prestige of the passport, of the skin and eye colour, not only in the Middle East but worldwide, a different definition of 'quality', etc etc. Professional apartheid (as much as TEFL can still be referred to as a 'profession'). And some of 'us' then go ahead and complain about discrimination against women etc in the Middle East!
Charity begins at home.
In fact, the world would be a much better place if everybody just went home.
Guys, let's go home!
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another money-spinner for IELTS ! Some native-speakers take IELTS to get more points on the their application to emigarte to Australia. Many struggle to get 5 ! Reading and Writing present particular problems to those who never handle a text more comples than a story in the "Sun".
Last edited by scot47 on Fri May 31, 2013 12:42 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
desert_traveller wrote: |
But another equally valid question may be, why only the non-native speakers? And the funny thing was, it wasn't even the non-native speakers, basically it was passport holders from countries where English is not the first language. There was a guy there with a British passport, Asian origins, no one ever understood a word of what he said. No IELTS was required from him. |
And why would he be required to do so? Frankly, you're pointing the finger in the wrong direction. The individuals involved with signing off on hiring that teacher are at fault because this issue began at the recruiting/hiring level. If an applicant/interviewee exhibits substandard writing and/or speaking skills (e.g., questionable pronunciation, spelling errors, improper application of vocabulary items, etc.), then khalas, they don't get hired. Simple as that. With the exception of (some) non-native speakers, there are strategies to ascertain an applicant's written and oral language proficiency that don't involve passing a requisite, standardized test. Additionally, there's the probationary period in which new employees are evaluated on their ability to do the job, factoring in the quality of their overall communication skills. But if those charged with making hiring decisions can't competently discern a candidate's abilities or don't give a hoot because they're only looking for a warm body to fill the position, then... It is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Charity begins at home."
Alas, the problem is that for many it also ends there.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sicklyman
Joined: 02 Feb 2013 Posts: 930
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
Writing... a text more comples than a story in the "Sun". |
nuffsed  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eh ? Lesser mortals make spelling mistakes. I do TYPOS and often TYOPS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sheik Yerbuti
Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Posts: 105 Location: the promised land
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sick obviously hasn't read many of Scot's 10,000 plus
posts...
And why should I go home when they are willing to pay me
7 large a month to stay?
Any native speaker teacher in KSA who can't score 99% or better
on IELTS , TOEFL, you name it should go home... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Linguist
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You may ask why they had to do a test, and why they had to get such an impressive score in IELTS? |
When did IELTS claim that their test could be used as a means to evaluate teachers' proficiency? This is outrageous and an abuse of the test.
I had once a native speaker write to me that he 'teached' English and wanted a university job. Needless to say, no one were duped enough to employ him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Needless to say, no one were duped enough to employ him. |
"I never made a mistake in grammar except one in my life, and as soon as I done it, I seen it." ~ Carl Sandburg, American poet (1878 - 1967) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear nomad soul,
Maybe you should have used bold and underlined:
" . . . no one were . . ."
Regards,
John  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Linguist
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Eh ? Lesser mortals make spelling mistakes. I do TYPOS and often TYOPS |
heh heh  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|