|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:26 pm Post subject: [Un]countability codings |
|
|
I was leafing through the Oxford Pocket Learner's Dictionary earlier today and happened to notice that 'imposition' was coded [U, C]. Turning to the MED I found the following entries/examples:
Quote: |
1 [uncountable] the introduction of something such as a new law or a new system imposition of: the imposition of economic sanctions
2 [countable] [usually singular] an unfair or unreasonable situation that you are expected to accept Expecting employees to work longer hours for the same pay is a huge imposition. |
( http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/imposition )
Maybe I'm missing or have forgotten something, but I can't see how an article could ever be omitted (unlike say with 'water' versus 'the water' or even 'a [glass of] water'), so I'm puzzled by the [U] coding here.
The same puzzle can be found at e.g. the [U] code-entry for 'introduction' in both dictionaries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear fluffyhamster,
1 [uncountable]
the act of introducing something such as a new law or rule, or a new tax
the imposition of martial law
the imposition of tax on domestic fuel
I believe that only the article "an" would be inappropriate in the examples given above.
It would be unusual, however, be come across examples in which "the" would be omitted (i.e. the "general" rather than "specific" uncountable.
How much imposition can we take?
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi John. Yes, the indefinite article doesn't go too well there (or would probably involve changes elsewhere: the government is considering [imposing] a tax on domestic fuel).
The [U] coding suggests the 'the' in the example following it could be omitted, by analogy with "proper" uncountables/uncountable usages, which seems misleading. But hopefully students will be guided more by the examples than the codes, and turn to and be able to follow the clearer treatments in the entries for 'water', 'love', etc.
Quote: |
How much imposition can we take? |
There is still a "quantity" to, a "quantifying" of, in that there usage LOL. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|