|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Wilsonthefarmer

Joined: 13 Nov 2012 Posts: 152 Location: Riding my black horse
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:04 pm Post subject: Stalin: The Tyrant as Editor with Blue Pencil |
|
|
"Djugashvili (later Stalin) was a ruthless person, and a serious editor. The Soviet historian Mikhail Gefter has written about coming across a manuscript on the German statesman Otto von Bismarck edited by Stalin's own hand. The marked-up copy dated from 1940, when the Soviet Union was allied with Nazi Germany. Knowing that Stalin had been responsible for so much death and suffering, Gefter searched "for traces of those horrible things in the book." He found none. What he saw instead was "reasonable editing, pointing to quite a good taste and an understanding of history."
Stalin had also made a surprising change in the manuscript. In the conclusion, the author closed with a warning to the Germans lest they renege on the alliance and attack Russia. Stalin cut it. When the author objected, pleading that the warning was the whole point of the book, Stalin replied, "But why are you scaring them? Let them try. ..." And indeed they did, costing more than 30 million lives—most of them Soviet. But the glory was Stalin's in the end.
Stalin always seemed to have a blue pencil on hand, and many of the ways he used it stand in direct contrast to common assumptions about his person and thoughts. He edited ideology out or played it down, cut references to himself and his achievements, and even exhibited flexibility of mind, reversing some of his own prior edits.
Even when not wielding his blue pencil, Stalin's editorial zeal was all-consuming. He excised people—indeed whole peoples—out of the manuscript of worldly existence, had them vanished from photographs and lexicons, changed their words and the meanings of their words, edited conversations as they happened, backing his interlocutors into more desirable (to him) formulations. "The Poles have been visiting here," he told the former Comintern chief Georgi Dimitrov in 1948. "I ask them: What do you think of Dimitrov's statement? They say: A good thing. And I tell them that it isn't a good thing. Then they reply that they, too, think it isn't a good thing."
More about the topic see this link ....
http://chronicle.com/article/Stalins-Blue-Pencil/142109?cid=megamenu
He who lives by the blue pencil must know that history is subject to revision.
Holly Case is an associate professor of history at Cornell University.
Indeed Holly Case, history of the Soviet Union under Stalin must be subject to revision!
Any thought on the above topic, Comrade Sasha?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My thoughts? Said article is nothing more than counter-revolutionary propaganda. Circulated by kulaks, anti-social elements, and other undesirables. Back to the kolkhoz with you all. Eternal glory to the Motherland! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wilsonthefarmer

Joined: 13 Nov 2012 Posts: 152 Location: Riding my black horse
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
Said article is nothing more than counter-revolutionary propaganda. Circulated by kulaks, anti-social elements, and other undesirables. Back to the kolkhoz with you all. Eternal glory to the Motherland! |
I am surprised that some people still believe in revolution of the communism in the 21st century!
I suggest your read The Black Book of Communism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_book_of_communism
Quote: |
Back to the kolkhoz with you all |
"In practice, many Kolkhoz did not pay their "members" much at all. In 1946, 30 percent of Kolkhoz paid no cash for labor at all, 10.6 paid no grain, and 73.2 percent paid 500 grams of grain or less per day worked.[5] In addition the kolkhoz was required to sell their crop to the State which fixed prices for the grain. These were set very low and the difference between what the State paid the farm and what the State charged consumers represented a major source of income for the Soviet government."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkhoz
Well, Comrade Sasha, what about working as a kolkhoznik in my farm, and I will pay you generously, with only 30 hours work per week, plus annual leave of 45 days. What do you think?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you got the bit about counter-revolutionary propaganda, did you? Black Book? Ah, that's almost funny. Even as funny as believing in money and capitalism in the 21st century. At least this vrag naroda has a sense of humour. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Payt no attention to Wilson who is a devotee of Hassan Al Banna. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|