|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ghost
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 1:36 pm Post subject: Teaching in a Chinese 'Normal' University - teacher training |
|
|
I am applying for a position in a teacher training college in Guandong Province.
Has anyone taught at a place like this, and what were your general impressions of teaching future English teachers who happen to be Chinese?
How does teaching future teachers compare with teaching General English in a typical university?
If I am offered the job, I just want to be sure that I am qualified to do it, as I had a less than positive experience in Korea when teaching already qualified Korean teachers of English at GIFLE (www.gifle.go.kr) - They were there for 'refresher courses' and/or to upgrade their skills. The Korean teachers were extremely demanding and it was not a positive experience, because although they seemed satisfied in class, they would run to the administration at the drop of a hat if things did not go to their liking.
I want to make sure I do not run into the same problems here.
Thank you.
Ghost |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big Worm
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also taught English to experienced English teachers in another country. I thought it was going to be an awesome time. It was the worst teaching gig of my life. Basically you have 20+ experienced teachers (some of which may have more experience/qualifications than you) in the same room. Some of them are already cynical because you are a foreigner. But ALL of them think they know the best way to teach an English class. They all have different ideas, and their ideas are different than yours. So basically even if they are all nice to you, they still think they are better than you at your job. Sometimes they're right.
That's a long summer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Javelin of Radiance

Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1187 Location: The West
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think teaching people who are already qualified teachers and teaching students who are still studying to be teachers are two different experiences.
At my previous job I was asked to give some kind of ad hoc presentations (not teaching related) to a group of Chinese English teachers on the topics of my choice. The whole thing was poorly thought out from the start, and when we did get together almost no-one had any interest in what I had to say. The idea was abandoned a few weeks in, thank God.
Teaching English majors in a college setting is a decent job. They're usually more motivated and capable than non-English majors (general English?). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
doogsville
Joined: 17 Nov 2011 Posts: 924 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It might not be too bad depending on their age. I taught both middle school and primary school teachers for a series of 'teacher training' classes about two years ago. The middle school teachers were horrible. They ranged in age from thirties to fifties, and the ones that bothered to turn up mostly sat there stony faced and didn't speak. When I asked them what they wanted to learn, they said 'tell us about foreign culture'. At least I think that's what they said, their English was pretty bad.
The primary school teachers on the other hand were younger, happier, and much more engaged in the class. They wanted new ideas and activities they could use in their own classrooms, and even devised a few activities of their own.
It might also depend on what your teaching them. If their training to be English teachers they may think that their English is already good enough and resent your input. If you meet that kind of resistance, I would think about pitching what you do as 'natural English', 'idiomatic English' or something along those lines. Let them think of themselves as advanced students, whether they are or not, and take it from there.
I would also make it clear from the outset that your background is in communicative language teaching, and very different from theirs and what they are used to, so they should try to approach it with an open mind, and not judge it from the perspective of their own cultural or educational background. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Javelin of Radiance

Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1187 Location: The West
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
doogsville wrote: |
It might not be too bad depending on their age. I taught both middle school and primary school teachers for a series of 'teacher training' classes about two years ago. The middle school teachers were horrible. They ranged in age from thirties to fifties, and the ones that bothered to turn up mostly sat there stony faced and didn't speak. When I asked them what they wanted to learn, they said 'tell us about foreign culture'. At least I think that's what they said, their English was pretty bad.
The primary school teachers on the other hand were younger, happier, and much more engaged in the class. They wanted new ideas and activities they could use in their own classrooms, and even devised a few activities of their own.
It might also depend on what your teaching them. If their training to be English teachers they may think that their English is already good enough and resent your input. If you meet that kind of resistance, I would think about pitching what you do as 'natural English', 'idiomatic English' or something along those lines. Let them think of themselves as advanced students, whether they are or not, and take it from there.
I would also make it clear from the outset that your background is in communicative language teaching, and very different from theirs and what they are used to, so they should try to approach it with an open mind, and not judge it from the perspective of their own cultural or educational background. |
I thought he was talking about teaching English majors at a normal university, meaning 19-22 yo university students studying to become teachers, not those who are already qualified. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big Worm
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yeah, you're right.
Then there's the matter of if you are there to teach them English or to teach them how to TEACH English. Make sure that everyone involved knows exactly what is expected from the class. It could be good tho. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ghost
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 8:52 pm Post subject: teaching future English teachers |
|
|
Thank you for your replies. I am very interested in the job, because the location is good, and the town is a provincial town (more to my liking compared with a major city) in addition to the fact that I have a very helpful interlocutor at the college in question.
I just want to be sure (as possible) that I am qualified to do the job, because I think teaching future teachers at a teacher training college would be very different from teaching 'General English' - this is a special job, and only the most qualified applicants need apply, I would imagine.
In Korea, It was a tough grind for one year, and most foreign teacher trainers there (www.gifle.go.kr) did not stay for more than two years - as the expectations were so high. Take a look at the website for an idea of what they expect of us in South Korea, which is a very competitive and intense education market.
To get back to the original, specific question - how different is teaching English to English teaching majors, compared with teaching English to students of other subjects who need to take English courses as part of their requirement? For one thing, I imagine that English majors, for one thing, one would have a much higher level of English (as they have been selected from a large pool of applicants, presumably) - this would mean, as well - that the expectations those students have (the English majors) would be correspondingly higher compared with 'other major' Chinese students.
Have any of you taught both groups (English majors and non English majors) and how would you compare the (assumed) vastly different jobs?
Thank you.
Ghost |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Simon in Suzhou
Joined: 09 Aug 2011 Posts: 404 Location: GZ
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A "normal" university does not really mean it is a teacher-training school anymore. This is just their historical roots. They surely have education majors, but I have worked at two normal universities and they are pretty much liberal arts schools with all sorts of majors.
English majors are generally more interested in English than other majors, but that does not mean their fluency will be higher. My English majors are enthusiastic, but my law majors are usually better at English. With that said, they are much better than computer science majors! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
doogsville
Joined: 17 Nov 2011 Posts: 924 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Javelin of Radiance"]
doogsville wrote: |
I thought he was talking about teaching English majors at a normal university, meaning 19-22 yo university students studying to become teachers, not those who are already qualified. |
He is, as far as I can tell. My point was not so much about qualified/unqualified, as it was about age, and open mindedness. There was a huge difference between the older middle school teachers, and the primary school teachers in terms of their willingness to learn. The OP mentioned his own negative experience of teaching already qualified teachers in Korea, I was sharing my similar experience here in China, but trying to sweeten it a little my mentioning that younger teachers here are easier to work with. Hopefully, even younger, unqualified students will be more amenable still.
Ghost, I think your experience will depend a lot on what exactly it is you're going to be teaching them. If it's language skills, then just assess their level and take it from there, using the techniques that have worked for you in the past. You might want to talk about why you do what you do as you go along, since it could be useful to them. If it's technique itself, teaching about teaching, I would just remind them that your methods are not traditional Chinese methods. Similarly, if they complain to the admin and the admin complain to you, remind them that they hired you as a 'foreign' teacher so that you could do exactly what your doing. If the students don't like it then they need to open their minds a little, assuming that's possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ghost
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 6:12 am Post subject: teaching in a normal university |
|
|
The expectations in Korea were so high, from the already qualified teachers. Several of the teachers, including myself, found it a challenge, because the Korean teachers wanted us to be 'dancing pandas' in the classroom and teach them games and activities, and that is really not my forte (some people are good at that). It is ironic, that when observing the way Koreans teach, they are not usually dancing pandas, but they expected that of us, and if any of our lessons were dry or boring, it meant trouble for us in our evaluations, which were the basis of being contracted or not.
It meant we were under constant pressure, and that was a tough situation to be in.
I am interested in this position in Guandong, but just want to be as sure as possible that I can handle the expectations.
Thank you.
Ghost |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NoBillyNO

Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 1762
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I
Quote: |
t is ironic, that when observing the way Koreans teach, they are not usually dancing pandas, but they expected that of us, and if any of our lessons were dry or boring, it meant trouble for us in our evaluations, which were the basis of being contracted or not. |
I have heard it described in this way.....Student have a hard and difficult time with classes and the real purpose of the FT classes is not to instruct but to give them an enjoyable class period where the pressure of learning is not ever present...not saying this is true or that anyone on this board subscribes to this notion.... just tht it was offered once a long time ago.. when I was task with teaching American history on the side .... I wasn't qualified any more than I was to teach English ... so therefore a whole generation of Chinese students think the South won the war of Northern Aggression. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
teenoso
Joined: 18 Sep 2013 Posts: 365 Location: south china
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find a huge difference between teaching English majors and teaching non-English majors : mainly in their motivation. Non-English majors need only to pass CET4 and CET6, but there is no spoken exam, so they don't really care.
English majors generally need to master the language in all its aspects , so are keen to learn and take part in class activities.
Some of the boys in English major classes , however, seem to get left behind and 'withdraw' to the back of the class and keep quiet if they can. Often they didn't choose their major , but it was chosen for them (by parents, or their poor College Entrance exam score).
I knew someone who taught in a 'normal college' in a small provincial city, just below uni level, and her students were mainly future primary school teachers, taking a three year degree/diploma. Their language skills were very poor , and the FT had a hard time ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|