|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LongShiKong
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 1082 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| spiral78 wrote: |
| Uh, probably because almost all of us think the whole idea is a bad one. |
But Spiral, this is not just an EFL site and as I pointed out, the OP is referring primarily to ESL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But, LongShiKong, he said:
Quote:
In TEFL this is even more acute as we're often away from home, employers aren't always honest about the conditions on offer and, just like any other industry, policies do change (see situation 2).
And I replied:
1. There are always other employers out there. Up to the teacher to have the skills, qualifications, reputation, and simple gumption to find a suitable one.
2. Anyone who's moved abroad without enough funds to get him/herself out of any difficult situation that may arise has been unwise. Many things can go wrong when living abroad, including but not limited to stuff connected with bad employers.
3.If your employer was dishonest about working conditions, move on, name and shame. See point 2 above; 'you' should have the funding to get yourself out of a situation - or don't go abroad in the first place.
4. If policies change, again, onus is on the teacher to move on.
If the 'teacher' hasn't got what it takes to get a reasonable job - qualifications, skill, simple personal gumption, then it is his/her responsibility to either get what s/he needs OR move into a different industry (I hear that MacDonald's takes people with a BA and you don't even need a TEFL cert - and they have unions in many places. Clearly paradise, in your books.)
The OP has written equally about some chain school in an unnamed European country (Turkey, I believe) as well as about the UK. And the US - not sure why US examples are often thrown in, but whatever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Considering all the time and effort put into rallying of the troops, designing and printing flyers, recruiting their students for the "cause," participating in demonstrations, storming language school offices with demand letters, manning facebook pages, going on strike, yada yada---all of it unpaid labor, by the way... When, if at all, are any of these solidarity people in a classroom actually teaching? Seriously.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suphanburi
Joined: 20 Mar 2014 Posts: 916
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But if he actually wanted to teach and was any good at it then these issues wouldn't apply.
The ONLY time I hear calls for "unionization" and "protection" are when disgruntled, inept, unqualified, self-entitled", or just plain lazy people need "protection" from employers who want to pay them what they are worth rather than what they think they are entitled to.
If they spent 1/2 the time and effort in the classroom that they spent trying to avoid it through union promotion activities then they wouldn't have an issue.
Back to my key point.
QUALIFIED AND COMPETENT teachers don't get made redundant except in unionized situations when "seniority" takes precedence over quality.
If on the odd chance they do lose their position there is no shortage of well paid work for those who are QUALIFIED AND COMPETENT and willing to move to it.
Teachers (supposedly people who are reasonably educated) who knowingly accept a bad contract have no one but themselves to blame for it. They read it and signed it.
Those who sign a contract in good faith usually have well defined, legal alternatives if it is broken (not that they would usually try to use them - it is easier to piss and moan on an ESL/EFL forum).
And in closing, EVERY TIME some small group tries to "unionize" TEFL teachers in any country I have worked in it has ALWAYS resulted in things being worse after the fact.
If you want better pay and conditions a "union" is NOT the way to go. These are not labour factories where one unskilled, warm body is as good as the next one and just as cheap.
GOOD, QUALIFIED, and COMPETENT teachers are hard to find and worth pay to keep on staff. Unionized workers are little more than a race to the bottom in skilled worker positions.
£60k per year (with wait-lists) goes a long way in SE Asia.
Why would I give that up for some "union" job at 24k.
If you want to unionize, go to McDs or Walmart or TESCO where incompetence, and ignorance are rewarded appropriately.
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeepers! Such a crowd of splitters and wreckers. Has nobody here never wanted to hurl a Molotov at the TEFL piggies? Haven't you ever ripped up the cobbles to usher in a glorious era of teacherly freedom?!
I sense a lack of class consciousness on this thread. Off to the re-education camps with the lot of you!
Hic! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongShiKong
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 1082 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| spiral78 wrote: |
But, LongShiKong, he said:
Quote:
In TEFL this is even more acute ....
And I replied:
1. ....
... not sure why US examples are often thrown in, but whatever. |
Unlike developing regions, it's the US that has a long history of successful labour unrest which, as we all know, has contributed to its economic implosion. That's why I responded on the first page with:
| Quote: |
In public education including TESL (which I presume the OP is interested in), it may very well be an area of contention, especially for those paying union dues (regardless of income or benefit package).
But in the TEFL world, market-forces dictate what employers can and can't get away with. And that's doubly true for the minority of us native-English speakers. |
The OP conveniently forgets that ESL is an ocean apart from EFL. Any mistreatment of migrant workers in Canada makes national headlines. On the flip side, do you think the China Daily would run a story on the 10 of us whose contract terms were violated... or any other nation's media for that matter? Can anyone name a 'blacklisted' language school in NA, the UK or western Europe that's still in business?
| suphanburi wrote: |
| YOUR sense of entitlement is out of touch with the reality that is the labour market today. |
These days, it's not just unskilled or under-educated teachers that find themselves at the mercy of market forces. In Canadian 1st and 2nd year uni programs, tenured faculty have largely been replaced by what are called 'adjunct', 'sessional' or (less euphemistically) 'contract' faculty in order to cut costs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suphanburi
Joined: 20 Mar 2014 Posts: 916
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LongShiKong wrote: |
| suphanburi wrote: |
| YOUR sense of entitlement is out of touch with the reality that is the labour market today. |
These days, it's not just unskilled or under-educated teachers that find themselves at the mercy of market forces. In Canadian 1st and 2nd year uni programs, tenured faculty have largely been replaced by what are called 'adjunct', 'sessional' or (less euphemistically) 'contract' faculty in order to cut costs. |
Tenure is another outmoded concept from a bygone era when academics needed protection from the state when voicing unpopular ideas - things like the sun and not the earth are the center of the solar system and evolution rather than divine intervention created the diversity in biological populations.
Why would a lecturer for 1st and 2nd year undergrads need such "protections"?
It's not as if "econ 101" or "calculus 110" or "principles of 2nd language learning 240" promote much controversy.
It's not as though lecturers for freshmen classes are in short supply.
When I was a young undergrad for the 1st time back in the 70s I had a few lazy-ass profs who shouldn't have been anywhere near a classroom but they couldn't be terminated due to "tenure".
Now...
Hire as needed for the job that needs doing.
If there is no demand for the prof (no enrollments in his subject area) then there is no need to keep him warming his office chair for months or years on end.
Competence is rewarded with renewals.
Incompetence is rewarded with unemployment.
Entitlement is NOT a "given".
There is no "employment for life" on a gravy train due to "tenure".
.
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Unlike developing regions, it's the US that has a long history of successful labour unrest which, as we all know, has contributed to its economic implosion."
Do we know this? I always thought that the American economic woes were due entirely to Piggie shenanigans, greed, and outsourcing rather than an honest worker demanding basic rights such as a safe workplace, fixed hours and days off, an end to child labour, legal contracts etc. |
|
| |