|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rxk22
Joined: 19 May 2010 Posts: 1629
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:20 pm Post subject: Loggers and ALTs |
|
|
OK, a bit unrelated to ESL, but it may have an impact
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-06/women-harvesting-trees-meet-two-planks-of-abe-japan-plan.html
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/08/08/business/women-armed-chain-saws-head-hills-abes-growth-plan/#.VAMM1mN0xqM
Abe is trying to bring back forestry back to Japan. Which makes sense, as More than two-thirds of Japan’s roughly 146,000 square miles of land is wooded. This would reduce imports from countries like Indonesia, which have a problem with logging. And also carbon blah blah blah.
That said, this could end up being a $9.5 billion industry, as it was long ago. Now why should we care? This will put sustainable jobs in rural areas. Which means more ALTs, possibly in rural areas. As this would add to the local economies. Meaning there would be more than farming and jobfare.
Especially super rural areas like Hokkaido, and Tohoku would benefit from this.
I dunno, I just like seeing jobs being made that aren't in the blackhole that is Tokyo. As it just sucks in so many people and capital that it is making it hard to buck the low birthrate trend, and Tokyo is the lowest in all of Japan with 1.1 or so.
Also, some of the smaller islands, such as Sato, and Tsushima may benefit from this as well. Be interesting to see if anyone has seen any of this occur, or is it too early? I am in the Tokyo area, so I haven't, and can't see any of the affects. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rooster.
Joined: 13 Mar 2012 Posts: 247
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't support it. Japan has done a good job of keeping its nature pristine, this will just ruin it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
natsume
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 409 Location: Chongqing, China
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rooster. wrote: |
I don't support it. Japan has done a good job of keeping its nature pristine, this will just ruin it. |
The paved rivers are spotlessly clean and pure! Good job, Japan! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rxk22
Joined: 19 May 2010 Posts: 1629
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Between paving the rivers and the coasts. they don't do such a good job.
Thing is, logging can be sustainable. Which would replace the silly pointless construction in the rural areas with sustainable real jobs.
Besides, if Japan doesn't do logging, then essentially they are exporting their pollution and environmental damage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
rxk22 wrote: |
Between paving the rivers and the coasts. they don't do such a good job.
Thing is, logging can be sustainable. Which would replace the silly pointless construction in the rural areas with sustainable real jobs.
Besides, if Japan doesn't do logging, then essentially they are exporting their pollution and environmental damage. |
Yes, logging ***CAN*** be sustainable. But it doesn't HAVE to be sustainable. It's more expensive to make it sustainable (think 'tree farms'). When I lived in a rural area, they had logging (I was told that it was winding down when I arrived there, and I was there for three years). It meant 'clear-cutting' and no regrowth strategy to be seen. I think they started replanting on a small scale near the end of my time there, but it was probably a case of too little, too late. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rxk22
Joined: 19 May 2010 Posts: 1629
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GambateBingBangBOOM wrote: |
Yes, logging ***CAN*** be sustainable. But it doesn't HAVE to be sustainable. It's more expensive to make it sustainable (think 'tree farms'). When I lived in a rural area, they had logging (I was told that it was winding down when I arrived there, and I was there for three years). It meant 'clear-cutting' and no regrowth strategy to be seen. I think they started replanting on a small scale near the end of my time there, but it was probably a case of too little, too late. |
Hahaha too true. Logging should be sustainable. Not just because one should care about the enviro. But because in the long run, you can cut down more trees that way. Clear cutting means that it may take 60-70 years to regrow mature forests, while with replanting it is more around 45 years.
I hope with this new campaign, that they are smart about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|